|
|
 | | Re: Error Message
|
| The only thing I could think of is if NQC thinks you are generating code for some other device (e.g. CyberMaster). Try adding -Trcx2 to the command line to force NQC to target RCX2. If that doesn't fix it, email me the program and I'll take a look. (...) (23 years ago, 7-Apr-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
| | | | | Robot Controller 1.5
|
| I have released a new (beta) version of Robot Controller, the ideal companion to NQC for Mac OS X. This version adds support for serial IR towers (provided you have a working serial port) and makes several other minor improvements. Download it now (...) (23 years ago, 7-Apr-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
| | | | | Re: Need help with NQC
|
| "Russell Newman" <victoreden@netzero.net> wrote in message news:GtLuCA.38p@lugnet.com... (...) RCX (...) In what way is it misbehaving? When backing up, it only backs up for 3/4 of a second. Is that enough? When turning, it only turns for a maximum (...) (23 years ago, 4-Apr-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
| | | | | Error Message
|
| Hi. Can anyone help me with a problem I'm having. I'm writing a fairly simple program in NQC and when I compile I get an error saying "undefined variable SENSOR_LIGHT" The line that generates this error is simply: SetSensor(SENSOR_1, SENSOR_LIGHT); (...) (23 years ago, 4-Apr-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
| | | | | Re: lego turing machine
|
| (...) I got to thinking, maybe this isn't so impossible after all. Imagine if you used 2x2 blocks with 2x2 tiles on top. Now you have something the RCX can lift. Run two pieces of train track parallel to each other, with four spots' width separating (...) (23 years ago, 29-Mar-02, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.robotics, lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
| | | | | Re: lego turing machine
|
| Hi JDF, Thanks for the feedback. I know it's not a Turing machine in the true sense, but let me tell you what I'm trying to do. At the moment I realize that I have built a sort of binary adder. But what I am currently implementing is a change in (...) (23 years ago, 29-Mar-02, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.robotics, lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
| | | | | Re: lego turing machine
|
| (...) An interesting idea, but the pedant and geek in me has to note that this isn't a Turing machine. Even ignoring Turing's original idea that the tape is infinite, the problem is that the Turing machine placed its output back on the tape. It (...) (23 years ago, 29-Mar-02, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.robotics, lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
| | | | | Re: lego turing machine
|
| murphy's law at its best: due to bandwith problems, my server has cut off my page. it now 1:30 am., and i've finally got a mirror up on an old yahoo account. it should do fine. looks like 0catch.com had a very big catch. www.geocities.com/aatishb/ (...) (23 years ago, 28-Mar-02, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.robotics, lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
| | | | | Re: lego turing machine
|
| I umm.. forgot to post the site along with the message. sorry. (smiling sheepishly) (URL) Bhatia" <aatish@mac.com> wrote in message news:Gtp1qJ.801@lugnet.com... (...) pics (...) technically (...) and (...) code (...) minimalistic, (...) (23 years ago, 28-Mar-02, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.robotics, lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
| | | | | turing machine follow up
|
| I umm.. forgot to post the site along with the message. sorry. (smiling sheepishly) (URL) (23 years ago, 28-Mar-02, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.robotics, lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
|
