| | Re: patch for lnpd ( Collision problem in far-mode ) Martin Cornelius
|
| | (...) Pardon, Mike, i should have anticipated that, because i had the same problem when i first tried to apply a patch. The usage of patch is a little uncommon: You have to provide the patch through stdin !. Thus, i'd suggest the following (...) (25 years ago, 13-Feb-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| | |
| | | | Re: patch for lnpd ( Collision problem in far-mode ) Michael Marklew
|
| | | | I applied the patch manually (ok. I admit it was fairly obvious where the changes had to be made) Maby I made a mistake applying the patch or something as I still get Collission errors. I tried two IR towers in both near and far mode, still the same (...) (25 years ago, 14-Feb-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: patch for lnpd ( Collision problem in far-mode ) Martin Cornelius
|
| | | | (...) Someway it looks like there is another problem with your setup, in near mode i have never seen the collision problem. Perhaps your encountering the problem reported by Toni: Obviuosly his uart does not work in 16450 mode, but does work in (...) (25 years ago, 14-Feb-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: patch for lnpd ( Collision problem in far-mode ) Michael Marklew
|
| | | | Thanks for you help Martin. I tried the uart stuff with no change except for this: From further testing I realised that the data that the IR Tower is sending is been recieved by the RCX (woohoo) even though a collision is reported for every sent (...) (25 years ago, 17-Feb-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: patch for lnpd ( Collision problem in far-mode ) Martin Cornelius
|
| | | | (...) Michael, have you rebuilt lnpd with the transceiver.c i sent you ? The collision problem should completely go away then. I could also send you a statically linked version of my latest version of lnpd, just to check it isn't a compiler problem. (...) (25 years ago, 17-Feb-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| | | | |