| |
> EGCS was kind of a reinvention of gcc, which then became the official gcc • once
> it was good enough. http://gcc.gnu.org/faq.html#gcc
So EGCS is more recent than gcc? I can't seem to find the official download
site for it anywhere. gcc 3.0.4 was ubdated earlier this year... This
whole relationship between gcc and EGCS is very confusing, especially when
www.freshmeat.net doesnt even have egcs available!
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Lingo
|
| (...) EGCS was an offshoot of GCC, with the only difference being how the developers worked together (the bazaar vs. the cathedral model). Eventually, EGCS was declared the victor as most developers switched to it and it became the official GCC (...) (22 years ago, 15-May-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
| | | Re: Lingo
|
| No, sorry if I was confusing. EGCS is now obsolete. See (URL) and (URL) Original Message ----- From: "Samuel Winchenbach" <swinchen@eece.maine.edu> To: <lugnet.robotics.rcx...ugnet.com> Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 3:24 PM Subject: Re: Lingo (...) (22 years ago, 15-May-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Lingo
|
| (...) A mailing list without any posts isn't much use :-) (...) gcc is the compiler, and it uses the binutils tools. The build script just automates the several commands you would otherwise have to type. (...) Yep. You need a compiler that creates (...) (22 years ago, 15-May-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
10 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
