Subject:
|
Re: legOS Network Protocol
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos
|
Date:
|
Thu, 15 Apr 1999 22:28:44 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1313 times
|
| |
|
|
This would almost have to be a UDP like protocol just because the RCX
has such limited resources and the complexity of adding transmision
control to the protocol would be nasty.
I really hate news groups, I like having messages sent to me directly.
I would like to set up a listserv for the LNP project rather than news
group postings. Would this upset anyone? We could post latest updates
to the newsgroups and leave general conversations to the list.
-Jake
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: legOS Network Protocol
|
| (...) I am not in position right now, time-wise, to contribute to the LNP, but I am very interested, and may have time to contribute soon. In the mean time, I'd like to keep up with the project. I don't know if you realize, Jacob, but if you prefer (...) (26 years ago, 15-Apr-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
| | | Re: legOS Network Protocol
|
| Jacob S. Barrett <jsbarrett@acm.org> wrote in message news:3716681C.D5C8C6...acm.org... (...) You can subscribe to this newsgroup as a mailing list. I would prefer to see it on this group (or less thing to subscribe to) or to have lugnet make a new (...) (26 years ago, 16-Apr-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: legOS Network Protocol
|
| (...) Sounds good. Does it provide a stream interface or datagrams only? My faulty memory suggests that it might be the latter. If the network implementation supports packet reassembly (packets larger than MTU), there may not be a need for a stream (...) (26 years ago, 14-Apr-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
13 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
