 | | Re: Call for debugging support
|
|
(...) I doubt that's portable (and I'm a little surprised). (...) Only on sockets. (...) Don't be funny! Windows has its own threads, of course. Cheers, Ben. -- SECURE HOSTING AT THE BUNKER! (URL) grandfather once told me that there are two kinds of (...) (25 years ago, 17-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: Call for debugging support
|
|
(...) It is MIME encoding for non-ASCII characters. Cheers, Ben. -- SECURE HOSTING AT THE BUNKER! (URL) grandfather once told me that there are two kinds of people: those who work and those who take the credit. He told me to try to be in the first (...) (25 years ago, 17-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: (Failed) Getting LegOS 0.2.2 working on Windows
|
|
(...) The cygnus.bat file sets some environment variables (MAKE_MODE and PATH). You could probably call cygnus.bat from the MS command prompt, although i haven't tried that. (...) Well, the instructions do say to use "tar xvfz", maybe we should (...) (25 years ago, 17-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: (Failed) Getting LegOS 0.2.2 working on Windows
|
|
Hi, thank you all for your help. (...) works now. I think the problem was that I used MS Command Prompt and called bash there instead of using the cygwin window directly. (...) Could fix that as well. I used Winzip to unpack legOS instead of tar (...) (25 years ago, 17-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: Call for debugging support
|
|
Sorry to digress, but I just wanted to ask a question: is "equal sign B 4" supposed to be a code for the apostrophe? (They're not translating to apostrophes on my viewer.) How then would you make other symbols? Does this code reference some (...) (25 years ago, 17-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: Call for debugging support
|
|
(...) hello Markus, i´m still working on a (hopefully) portable, robust version of linux LNP, that allows multiple client tasks or threads on the PC to communicate with one ore more RCX´s simultanously via one tower, ( one of them could be gdb, in (...) (25 years ago, 17-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | RE: Call for debugging support
|
|
(...) I'm not sure what the issues are, Markus. But I could have a look at it in the new year. The lack of debugger support in legOS was one of the main reasons behind my development of pbForth. That and the fact that you can (one day) host pbForth (...) (25 years ago, 16-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Call for debugging support
|
|
Hello everyone, a while ago several people discussed decent debugging facilities for legOS, possibly in the form of remote gdb support. Did work in this avenue progress to something faintly usable already? If not, what are the key problems? Ciao, (...) (25 years ago, 16-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: (Failed) Getting LegOS 0.2.2 working on Windows
|
|
Strange. I got my cygwin through the cygnus site, but as far as i can tell it's the same as the one on arthurdent. Mine comes from one of the mirrors on ftp://go.cygnus.com/...n/latest/. The file is called full.exe. (...) Make --version gives me: (...) (25 years ago, 15-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: (Failed) Getting LegOS 0.2.2 working on Windows
|
|
It is quite possible that there is a versioning problem here. The cygwin on arthurdent is reasonably new (August?), but not exactly cutting edge. Peter provided me with links to everything except that, so I provided my own. If he'll provide me with (...) (25 years ago, 15-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: (Failed) Getting LegOS 0.2.2 working on Windows
|
|
(...) I tried this on a NT 4 machine with little success. First of I got the message: chili : /legOS make for i in util lib boot demo ; do make -C $i || exit -1 ; done i was unexpected at this time. make: *** [all] Error 1 After replacing the make (...) (25 years ago, 15-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | A Hosting Offer (was Re: Getting LegOS 0.2.2 working on Windows)
|
|
Thanks are due to Peter for the perserverance to get this thing working. On a related note, there has been quite a bit of legOS related development lately, and since I have (for the near future- a year and a half at least) unlimited bandwidth and (...) (25 years ago, 14-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Getting LegOS 0.2.2 working on Windows
|
|
Instructions to get a working LegOS 0.2.2 on Windows are at: (URL) Much thanks is due to Luis Villa for editing and hosting. Peter (25 years ago, 14-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: compiling 0.2.2 (legos.srec)
|
|
(...) I've encountered the same problem. But it can be resolved, by adding a trailing / to the LEGOS_ROOT variable in Makefile.common Regards Carsten (25 years ago, 14-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: legOS applications
|
|
(...) Great! Is there any documentation on that, more precisely how it is to be used? Has it been tested? I don't have access to my PC until the end of the year, so I can't check if there is anything in the distribution... :-( /Vlad (25 years ago, 14-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: legOS applications
|
|
(...) Yes, that's exactly how it works. Markus. (25 years ago, 13-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | legOS applications
|
|
Hi! I might have misunderstood things, so please forgive if this is a question that should not have been asked... The "dynamic loading of programs and modules" feature in legOS 0.2.x - does it mean one can download the kernel once, and then the (...) (25 years ago, 13-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: LNP congestion avoidance improved
|
|
Great! While it is too late for the class I'm helping out with, and it currently looks like it won't be offered again, I'm still looking forward to playing with this in the spring. Thanks so much for the time invested, Martin- Luis (...) ###...### (...) (25 years ago, 13-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | LNP congestion avoidance improved
|
|
Hi there, on my way to a reliable LNP layer (and gdb, hopefully), i did some tests about how well LNP congestion avoidance works: I compiled 2 functionally identical programs, one on my linux-box, one on my RCX. Both of them setup an adressing (...) (25 years ago, 13-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | firmdl3 doesn't work
|
|
firmdl3 doesn't work for me. Normally the rcx shows numbers up to 24 or 48, then counts back up very quickly, then after a while the program quits.There was only once where it might've worked. I also tried slow, but that stops right after mode=slow. (...) (25 years ago, 11-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
