Subject:
|
Re: Call for debugging support
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos
|
Date:
|
Fri, 17 Dec 1999 10:10:55 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1375 times
|
| |
|
|
Martin Cornelius wrote:
> My currently favored approach is to use select() for everything, my
> tests show it is not affected by the hardware FIFO of the uart.
I doubt that's portable (and I'm a little surprised).
> Of
> course, this requires to run the select() loop in a separate thread, but
> POSIX threads are portable, hopefully. BTW, can anybody tell me if WINxx
> supports
> select()
Only on sockets.
> and/or POSIX threads ?
Don't be funny! Windows has its own threads, of course.
Cheers,
Ben.
--
SECURE HOSTING AT THE BUNKER! http://www.thebunker.net/hosting.htm
http://www.apache-ssl.org/ben.html
"My grandfather once told me that there are two kinds of people: those
who work and those who take the credit. He told me to try to be in the
first group; there was less competition there."
- Indira Gandhi
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Call for debugging support
|
| (...) I seem to recall there being a pretty good pthreads implementation for windows, and voila... (URL) Ferrari and Marco Beri also referred to a "native" pthreads library when they first released emuLegOS, but I can't actually find a link from (...) (25 years ago, 17-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Call for debugging support
|
| (...) hello Markus, i´m still working on a (hopefully) portable, robust version of linux LNP, that allows multiple client tasks or threads on the PC to communicate with one ore more RCX´s simultanously via one tower, ( one of them could be gdb, in (...) (25 years ago, 17-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
11 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
