 | | Re: Release candidate legos-0.2.5.2 avail for testing
|
|
(...) Well... see... now you boxed me in. ;-) of course you are correct. I was trying to give the benefit of the doubt to our author or to the cygwin developers. I really didn't think the version number should be in the path, but it was there, so I (...) (23 years ago, 19-Apr-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | RE: Makefile patch
|
|
Here's the latest on this end: I have some kind of incomplete cross compiler that I build using Max Bowsher's script.... I unpacked the legOS directory did 'make OSTYPE=cygwin' And now I can download helloworld (which is compiled for some reason) (...) (23 years ago, 18-Apr-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: Final prep. for 0.2.6 release
|
|
(...) I've modified my old patch "LNP checksum optimizations" so it can be applied against version 0.2.5.2, as Stephen asked me to. I've noticed that an older LNP patch -- see (URL) -- has been partly lost. That patch fixed some race conditions in (...) (23 years ago, 18-Apr-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: Makefile patch
|
|
Kingsley, I did encounter this error, but didn't specifically list the error in my description. You will need to: (...) *** this is the specific fix for "No rule to make target" (...) *** I included the following steps in case you run into these (...) (23 years ago, 18-Apr-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | RE: Makefile patch
|
|
I just tried the 2000r1_i686-cygwin32...00-hms.zip and now I get "make: *** No rule to make target I think during my tinkering I'm after deleting some necessary makefile or something, if there's anyone who can pinpoint what I'm missing it would be (...) (23 years ago, 18-Apr-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | RE: Makefile patch
|
|
I used binutils-2.12 and gcc-2.95.3 and Max Bowsher's build-h8x script. I got what I thought was a successful "ALL DONE" message, but I still can not make new .lx files for the RCX. Are there additional directories I need to add to my path...or (...) (23 years ago, 18-Apr-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: Makefile patch
|
|
Well, after a fairly frustrating couple of days, I was finally able to build legOS-0.2.5 yesterday evening. I will get to the details in a minute. The whole experience made me question the stability of Cygwin/GCC. Basically, I tried at least 3 (...) (23 years ago, 18-Apr-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: Release candidate legos-0.2.5.2 avail for testing
|
|
(...) No it doesn't! Cygwin stores some info in the registry. Besides, why would you want multiple cygwin versions? Max. (23 years ago, 18-Apr-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: Makefile patch
|
|
(...) Ooops. Forgot to remove that before I sent it to you. Delete that line. (...) Well, I wrote the script, so I guess it makes sense to me. (...) True... BUT: You are using the cygwin versions of binutils and gcc. I don't know why, and don't have (...) (23 years ago, 18-Apr-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: Release candidate legos-0.2.5.2 avail for testing
|
|
(...) My recent patch should fix this. If you have the time and inclination, please test it. Max. Patch included again for convenience's sake: ### BEGIN PATCH ### diff -mru cvs-legOS/Makefile.common work-legOS/Makefile.common --- (...) (23 years ago, 17-Apr-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
