 | | Official release of legOS 0.2.4 and legOS HOWTO 0.2.0
|
|
Hi, everyone! On behalf of Paolo Masetti and myself, and the rest of the legOS crew, I'd like to announce the release of legOS version 0.2.4. This is the first release in many months, and so it has lots of great goodies. *Vastly improved stability (...) (24 years ago, 28-Jul-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos, lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: solaris + legOS
|
|
(...) I've been toying with trying to get an autoconf going with legOS - does Windows support this? ROSCO (24 years ago, 28-Jul-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: solaris + legOS
|
|
(...) You do have FASYNC on Solaris, it's in <sys/file.h>. But this won't help much, as it is only there for socket IO. The same problem is with F_SETOWN, it is only defined for sockets, therefore you get the EINVAL. (...) No, we won't get SIGIO (...) (24 years ago, 27-Jul-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: solaris + legOS
|
|
(...) It's the default setting. (...) You can put dll in verbose mode (--verbose), and see what's going on between RCX and IR Tower. (...) Very few documentation on LNP... :-( You can watch in lnp.c & lnp-logical.c, or just ask, I've worked a lot (...) (24 years ago, 27-Jul-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: light sensor problem?
|
|
(...) Can you please tell me where to find this documentation? Mike (24 years ago, 27-Jul-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: rotation sensor thing solved
|
|
(...) Ahhh, this is a hint why it shows up now. The additional delay in the dsensor code shifts the duty cycle of the sensor down just a little bit, so it can't operate anymore. This will all be fixed with the new code in 0.2.5. I will get myself (...) (24 years ago, 27-Jul-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: solaris + legOS
|
|
(...) Oh yes. I can commit patches in CVS for you. :-) (...) Enjoy!!!! :-) Bye, Paolo. --- Ignorance is temporary; Stupidity lasts forever!!! (24 years ago, 27-Jul-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: utils/Makefile.common problem - djgpp
|
|
(...) I think that in we intented to write: # DJGPP does not define OSTYPE # ifndef OSTYPE OSTYPE=MSDOS endif Because we know that DJPP does not define OSTYPE. Are we sure that uname.exe is always present in a DJPP installation? (...) No problem. (...) (24 years ago, 27-Jul-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: rotation sensor thing solved
|
|
(...) This is a quite interesting situation to test. When I released patched sensors routines, I've tested the sensor values (expecially rotation one) with batteries full and with very exausted batteries, but never with exausted batteries and motors (...) (24 years ago, 27-Jul-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: rotation sensor thing solved
|
|
(...) Powering them more frequently but for a shorter time, you mean? Yes- I do see your point. This will be something to keep track of when/if we mess with the sensors in 0.2.x. BTW, in hindsight, this should have been obvious- the reason that the (...) (24 years ago, 27-Jul-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
