Subject:
|
Re: rotation sensor thing solved
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos
|
Date:
|
Thu, 27 Jul 2000 20:05:04 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1655 times
|
| |
|
|
> BTW, in hindsight, this should have been obvious- the reason that the
> sensors weren't recording when I was moving (and were when I was
> "processing") is probably because of the draw of the motors during
> movement.
This is a quite interesting situation to test. When I released patched
sensors routines, I've tested the sensor values (expecially rotation one)
with batteries full and with very exausted batteries, but never with
exausted batteries and motors on...
I think that this situation could lead to values out of range for actual
state table...
Need to be tested again and fixed. :-)
Bye,
Paolo.
---
"There's a girl.....in my bed?!.....YES!!" - Casper the friendly ghost
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: rotation sensor thing solved
|
| (...) Powering them more frequently but for a shorter time, you mean? Yes- I do see your point. This will be something to keep track of when/if we mess with the sensors in 0.2.x. BTW, in hindsight, this should have been obvious- the reason that the (...) (24 years ago, 27-Jul-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
5 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
