 | | Re: LNP ActiveX for windows users
|
|
Yannis- That's great! To be honest, I've never written a single line of code for Windows, so I can't be certain, but it looks very nicely organized and pretty straightforward in its interface. I'm sure someone will find a use for it, even if the (...) (24 years ago, 11-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: LNP ActiveX for windows users
|
|
(...) that (...) Great job! But, please, give us a pre-compiled version of .dll too... VC++ is not a free compiler... ;-) I was working to a lnpd porting to Win32 (quite finished indeed), but I can stop if your version is already finished and (...) (24 years ago, 11-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | LNP ActiveX for windows users
|
|
Hello, I spent some time working on an ActiveX for LNP communication and I think that may be of interest for some of the users of this group. You can find the sources at (URL) send me all your comments. Thanks, Yannis (24 years ago, 11-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: SDL and legOS (was: memory left)
|
|
Luis Villa <liv@duke.edu> wrote in message news:960488287.393fe...uke.edu... (...) productive, (...) Well, it depends of course on what you intend to do with it. If you for example design and implement a protocol of some sort, it's a great (...) (24 years ago, 9-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | two questions
|
|
Hey, everybody. I have two questions, most of which probably can't be understood by most of the readers on this list :( 1) Is there any way that the stack size might be miscalculated by the new, improved makelx? I've experienced a problem where a (...) (24 years ago, 9-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: lcd_refresh()- get rid of it?
|
|
Then I'll put a note in to that effect- can't believe I hadn't noticed that earlier. There are a couple of bugs in config.h, too (in the CONF_X depends on CONF_Y) sections, so I'll just check something in later. Nothing big, just irritating :) -Luis (...) (24 years ago, 9-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: lcd_refresh()- get rid of it?
|
|
"Luis Villa" <liv@duke.edu> wrote in message news:FvuEJE.F7I@lugnet.com... (...) Well, it depends on the line: #define CONF_LCD_REFRESH in file boot/config.h. If you comment it out, you still need lcd_refresh()... :-) Bye, Paolo. --- "The pessimist (...) (24 years ago, 8-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: SDL and legOS (was: memory left)
|
|
Quoting Torkel Niklasson <torkel.niklasson@te...ogic.com>: (...) That's what I gathered from the docs. Interesting- sounds much more productive, too, if perhaps a little limiting. (...) Great. What exactly do you mean by "adapt", by the way? Just (...) (24 years ago, 8-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | lcd_refresh()- get rid of it?
|
|
Hey, everyone (but I suppose Markus in particular, if he's still even out there anymore)- I've been playing with the LCD functions in the CVS legOS and, as far as I can tell, not a single one of the functions requires lcd_refresh() anyome. So far, (...) (24 years ago, 8-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | SDL and legOS (was: memory left)
|
|
Well, SDL is a very good programming language indeed. Its main attraction to me is that it draws your attention away from stupid little programming errors, such as memory allocation, pointers not pointing where they're supposed to point and (...) (24 years ago, 8-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
