RCX programmable brick : Search Results: range USB IR long Tower


Robotics / RCX / Search Results: range USB IR long Tower

Results 1741 – 1760 of 2193.

Search took 0.01 CPU seconds.

Messages: Full | Brief | Compact

Sort: Prefer Newer | Prefer Older | Best Match

		Re: Some goals, ideas, etc. for a new bytecode interpreter (long)
(...) Single-stepping through instructions would be a mode offered by the interpreter, and wouldn't require any breakpoints to be set. I suppose what the debugging information could contain is, instead of a list of valid breakpoints, a list of (...) (25 years ago, 10-May-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)

long
(score: 1.212)

		Re: Some goals, ideas, etc. for a new bytecode interpreter (long)
(...) I was not intending to limit its functionality to that performed by the RCX with the standard firmware loaded. I did say "when no new features are being exploited". The idea of flashing an identifier associated with the current program may not (...) (25 years ago, 10-May-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)

long
(score: 1.212)

		Re: Some goals, ideas, etc. for a new bytecode interpreter (long)
(...) While I agree that it should be similar, I think it may need some minor modifications to make it truly useful. For example, I would like to be able to control the motors without having to load a program or use a host computer. It would be nice (...) (25 years ago, 10-May-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)

long
(score: 1.212)

		Re: Some goals, ideas, etc. for a new bytecode interpreter (long)
(...) You have 4 7-segment characters which could display a 4 character text string (albeit with some of the characters being different case and some confusion between characters). (...) Adding limited functions to check the memory usage without (...) (25 years ago, 10-May-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)

long
(score: 1.212)

		Re: HOWTO v 0.1
(...) Thanks (I think...) (...) Because I've found that it is significantly faster, and nearly canonical (as, technically speaking, it is part of the same domain, despite being hosted elsewhere(Stanford, IIRC.)) The only reason I found it in the (...) (25 years ago, 3-May-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)

long
(score: 1.212)

		Bluetooth
I’ve just started a little project of building an interface between a RCX and a Bluetooth. For power supply I’m thinking of using one of the outputs on the RCX and for communication I’ll use the IR port(2400-baud), similar to Mindsensors´s RCX to (...) (19 years ago, 1-Dec-05, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)

ir
(score: 1.211)

		Multitasker test script
John, You might want to try this little script to try out the tasker. It's based on Koh's demo. If you type TASK0 AWAKE and then .TASKS, you will see the chain is ok and that TASK0 is running. Now press the RUN button on the RCX and try .TASKS (...) (25 years ago, 12-May-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)

long
(score: 1.210)

		FW: New pbFORTH
-----Original Message----- From: John Cooper [mailto:robots@jpsc.co.uk] Sent: Monday, May 10, 1999 6:07 AM To: Ralph Hempel Subject: Re: New pbFORTH (...) I'm not really interested in Java, if I were going to go that sort of route with a (...) (25 years ago, 11-May-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)

long
(score: 1.210)

		Re: avoid messaging
(...) I'd agree that a physical block is the easiest, although there is a software solution. The RCX can not recieve a command while it's transmitting - so if you saturate the transmitter with things to do, it will not be able to "look" for any (...) (19 years ago, 5-Dec-05, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.robolab, lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)

ir
(score: 1.210)

		Re: avoid messaging
(...) If you have an event waiting for a message, I doubt it will have much impact on the speed of the rest of the program. However, this will not catch the messages you're looking for. You can't use the "mail" function to receive op-code, such as (...) (19 years ago, 5-Dec-05, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.robolab, lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)

ir
(score: 1.210)

		Re: Lego Network Protocol questions
In lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos, Kekoa Proudfoot writes: [ ... ] (...) To this end, i've started work on a Discrete Event Simulator. The idea is to use this to see the effects of some of the things you mention above. Note that this is not an (...) (25 years ago, 21-May-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos, lugnet.robotics)

long
(score: 1.209)

		Robolab Motor Settings - ATTN. Dick Swan
Hello Dick, I am working with a professor at the University of Central Florida and we would like to use the Robolab software for several of our robotics classes. The one issue we see in doing that is that the motor settings in the software only (...) (19 years ago, 13-Nov-05, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.robolab)

range
(score: 1.209)

		Floating point support for 1142 bytes
Following some discussion about the topic a few weeks ago, I was sufficiently curious and motivated enough to write a floating point library for the H8/RCX. Initially I thought I'd implement a non-IEEE floating point format optimized for the RCX, (...) (25 years ago, 27-May-99, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.robotics.rcx)

long
(score: 1.208)

		Re: BricxCC release 3.3.7.10
(...) I've only just downloaded 3.3.7.10 having played with 3.3.7.7 for a week [using a serial tower and WinXP] and Vers.10 does seem to have a problem communicating , it sometimes cannot set a program running:The RCX shows the recieving triangle (...) (19 years ago, 12-Oct-05, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)

tower
(score: 1.207)

		Re: BricxCC release 3.3.7.10
(...) That would be a bug. My apologies. I had totally forgotten about that option. I don't know when I broke it but it definitely is broken. I've fixed it now so that if you have that option selected it pops up the templates and if you don't have (...) (19 years ago, 13-Oct-05, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)

tower
(score: 1.206)

		Re: signals / legOS internals
I misspoke when I said before that we have semaphores. What I meant was mutexes. We have had mutexes for quite awhile. Certainly long before I started on this signal thing. I started this long enough ago that I don't remember what particular problem (...) (25 years ago, 23-Jun-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)

long
(score: 1.206)

		Re: NQC/BricxCC test
(...) This seems to have fixed all the problems that I was having with the serial tower and Bricx. [It also downloaded new (Swan)firmware OK] The template right-click is great too :-) I wasn't able test out the new (Vers.10) graphing part as I dont (...) (19 years ago, 18-Oct-05, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)

tower
(score: 1.206)

		Re: signals / legOS internals
(...) Reading this again, I should mention that pushing things on the stack asynchronously is fine, as long as the stack pointer is always in the right place, which is why it must always always always point to the location I mentioned (and seemingly (...) (25 years ago, 23-Jun-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)

long
(score: 1.206)

		Controlling RoboSapien & family from RCX
Hi, It appears to be straight-forward to control the WowWee robots from RCX and generate their IR commands by controlling the TxD output pin of the RCX's processor. More info, small webcam video, and simple example source: (URL) opens up for a lot (...) (19 years ago, 7-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)

ir
(score: 1.205)

		communication between NXT and RCX!?
Since the NXT does not have IR capability, it will not be communicate with the RCX brick. If there is no such plan from LEGO to build in the new NXT such capability, I am afraid they are going to put RCX brick in an obsolete track!? O, no! ---...--- (...) (19 years ago, 9-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.robolab, lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)

ir
(score: 1.205)

More: Next Page >>