Subject:
|
Re: RF Connection To RCX
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics.rcx
|
Date:
|
Mon, 10 Jan 2000 07:23:34 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
4297 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.robotics.rcx, Terry King writes:
> Eric, this was the approach I was thinking of. This
> way all the 'regular' functions, software, RcxCC etc
> would continue to work.
>
> Limitations: Speed is the same..
Yep! I am going to make the RF/IR adapter plug in front of the RCX. And make
my RF tower to replace the IR tower. I know the IR carries on 38.5KHz. Does it
mean both transmt/receive signals working in the same 38.5KHz? If so, how can
I solve the ehco problem?
Enjor,
Eric
> Other approaches would require deep hacking, I believe.
>
> I envisioned two devices:
> 1. fit over the 'front' of the Rcx, plugging into
> output B for power, and hanging over the IR
> transmitter and receiver.
> 2. Slipped over the IR Tower in a similar fashion
> and probably had its own battery.
>
> 900Mhz would be Nice. Full duplex is not necessary, I
> believe. AT the slow data rate there could probably be simple
> ON-OFF keying / envelope detect. Unless you wanted
> 1/2 mile range!
>
>
> In Your other spare time.... :-)
>
> --
> Regards,
> Terry King ...In The Woods In Vermont
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: RF Connection To RCX
|
| Eric, this was the approach I was thinking of. This way all the 'regular' functions, software, RcxCC etc would continue to work. Limitations: Speed is the same.. Other approaches would require deep hacking, I believe. I envisioned two devices: 1. (...) (27 years ago, 7-Jan-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
9 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
