|
|
 | | Re: DCC for the RCX
|
| (...) hmm, color codes and being color blind dont really match well indeed... as far as electronic components go, I'm just a hobbyist. My day job is programming ;) Esger (21 years ago, 30-May-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx, lugnet.trains)
| | | | | Re: DCC for the RCX
|
| In lugnet.robotics.rcx, Esger Abbink wrote: <snip> (...) Perfectly understood. Thanks! My problem has always been that I wanted to get into electronics, but all those resistors 'n such used to have all these coloured stipes to denote the different (...) (21 years ago, 30-May-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx, lugnet.trains)
| | | | | Re: DCC for the RCX
|
| i have a question concerning how the DCC signal is sent Is it just sort of a "rider" on top of the power similar to X-10 home automation signals? If so could not the RCX be protected with diodes and used in conjunction with a standard train (...) (21 years ago, 30-May-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx, lugnet.trains)
| | | | | Re: DCC for the RCX
|
| (...) put in (...) Thanks, Larry, and thanks to all who posted or emailed. (...) one (...) Or is (...) It's important that the motor outputs share the load as evenly as possible. A stalled train motor can draw as much as 750ma, while a single motor (...) (21 years ago, 30-May-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx, lugnet.trains)
| | | | | Re: DCC for the RCX
|
| (...) I forget if I already replied with how nifty this is. I spotlighted it, I put in a news article at ILTCO (we're having some domain problems right now, a temporary url is iltco.northcomp.com) and I added it to the .trains header That ought to (...) (21 years ago, 30-May-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx, lugnet.trains)
| | | | | Re: DCC for the RCX
|
| (...) Hi Dave, no you wouldnt need any resistors or diodes. Esger (22 years ago, 30-May-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx, lugnet.trains)
| | | | | Re: DCC for the RCX
|
| (...) Sorry, my earlier post should have been more clear. I was just commenting on the fact that in general a resistor is _not_ a good way to reduce voltage to a train motor. And you recalled correctly: diode's are "one-way". Thats why you need to (...) (22 years ago, 29-May-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx, lugnet.trains)
| | | | | Re: DCC for the RCX
|
| (...) The problem with inductive load is that when current is interrupted, they generate large voltage spikes with reverse polarity. The diode absorbs these spikes and avoids destroying the driver... Philo (22 years ago, 29-May-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx, lugnet.trains)
| | | | | Re: DCC for the RCX
|
| (...) I'm no electronics engineer by any stretch-- A diode, iirc, allows DC current to 'flow thru' in only one direction. What would a diode do across the output on the top of the train motor? And why would one be good for 'inductive' loads such as (...) (22 years ago, 29-May-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx, lugnet.trains)
| | | | | Re: DCC for the RCX
|
| (...) I don't install them either, and I have done something like 30 motors so far. (...) True, but ONLY if you are just going to use the RCX as a output. You can dial the voltage that DB100's (and most other Digitrax) boosters put out to a exact (...) (22 years ago, 29-May-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx, lugnet.trains)
|
|
