 | | Re: What about this for a new RCX 2.5 setup?
|
|
There is stuff going on. But it isn't my highest priority at the moment :( (...) (23 years ago, 13-May-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: What about this for a new RCX 2.5 setup?
|
|
(...) cost) (...) Replying to my own post, Why not build our own? Glue together some bricks, hollow them out and put in one of these babys: (URL) something similar. The comunity could work out building instructions and develop our own add-ons. (...) (23 years ago, 13-May-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: What about this for a new RCX 2.5 setup?
|
|
(...) What might be doable and best is a documented bus extension (a card plug-in) slot. This could be taken to the extreme by making a cpu unit that just has power (plug-in option of course) and memory (expandable of course) and maybe the IR or (...) (23 years ago, 13-May-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | RE: What about this for a new RCX 2.5 setup?
|
|
I'd be happy with a good "official" LEGO SONAR sensor and a fixed version of the LEGO Rotation Sensor (without the lost "clicks" bug) On the RCX side, I'd like a RCX 3.0 with 6+ sensor inputs and more outputs (and more RAM. I'm using MANAS sets to (...) (23 years ago, 13-May-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: A very Power Tool
|
|
(...) For all of the virus creators and senders out there: if there's one thing worse than a witless script kiddie, it's a scum-sucking virus propagator. Send all of the viruses to me that you want. They'll just go to my 10GB bit-bucket. Loosers... (...) (23 years ago, 12-May-02, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | A very Power Tool
|
|
Do NOT OPEN THE ATTACHMENT!! It is a virus. It has been making the rounds, it is the KLEZ virus. Thought you all might want to know. Tim Burt (23 years ago, 11-May-02, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: What about this for a new RCX 2.5 setup?
|
|
Oh, and I forgot one of the "BIGGEST" wishes on the list: 5) Linksys wireless access port response rather than the directional IR port. Or at least SOME form of 900MHz+ communication that is non-directional, with higher bandwidth (who knows...maybe (...) (23 years ago, 10-May-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | What about this for a new RCX 2.5 setup?
|
|
Seems to me that the BEST implementation of the RCX would be for some CORE changes and feature sets to be built in. I realize that these would be somewhat expensive, but I would pay pretty good money to have an RCX with the following specs (built (...) (23 years ago, 10-May-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | [ANN] pbForth Version 2.1.3 Release
|
|
The new 2.1.3 Version of pbForth has only minor fixes thanks to the investigative efforts of David Rojas and Rob Harvey. They were able to provide detailed, reproducible bug reports, which makes fixing bugs so much easier. Thanks guys! Here's what (...) (23 years ago, 10-May-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx, lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
|
| |
| | Phantom.dll (Spirit.ocx replacement) Update.
|
|
I have updated the Phantom.dll component due to a minor bug. The bug involved the DataLog functions not working when used with VB.Net. Both updated source and binaries are available at: (URL) Jacquemin kjacquemin@cox.net (23 years ago, 1-May-02, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
