 | | What about this for a new RCX 2.5 setup?
|
|
Seems to me that the BEST implementation of the RCX would be for some CORE changes and feature sets to be built in. I realize that these would be somewhat expensive, but I would pay pretty good money to have an RCX with the following specs (built (...) (22 years ago, 10-May-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: What about this for a new RCX 2.5 setup?
|
|
Oh, and I forgot one of the "BIGGEST" wishes on the list: 5) Linksys wireless access port response rather than the directional IR port. Or at least SOME form of 900MHz+ communication that is non-directional, with higher bandwidth (who knows...maybe (...) (22 years ago, 10-May-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | RE: What about this for a new RCX 2.5 setup?
|
|
I'd be happy with a good "official" LEGO SONAR sensor and a fixed version of the LEGO Rotation Sensor (without the lost "clicks" bug) On the RCX side, I'd like a RCX 3.0 with 6+ sensor inputs and more outputs (and more RAM. I'm using MANAS sets to (...) (22 years ago, 13-May-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: What about this for a new RCX 2.5 setup?
|
|
(...) What might be doable and best is a documented bus extension (a card plug-in) slot. This could be taken to the extreme by making a cpu unit that just has power (plug-in option of course) and memory (expandable of course) and maybe the IR or (...) (22 years ago, 13-May-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: What about this for a new RCX 2.5 setup?
|
|
(...) cost) (...) Replying to my own post, Why not build our own? Glue together some bricks, hollow them out and put in one of these babys: (URL) something similar. The comunity could work out building instructions and develop our own add-ons. (...) (22 years ago, 13-May-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: What about this for a new RCX 2.5 setup?
|
|
There is stuff going on. But it isn't my highest priority at the moment :( (...) (22 years ago, 13-May-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
