 | | compiling C++ source under linux
|
|
Hi it's the 1st time I ask for your help. I have an urgent problem: i'm preparing a little software in C++ with legOS for linux for an university exam: I cannot 'make' C++ libraries nor main file: in the Makefile.common file there's a macro that (...) (25 years ago, 10-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | compiling C++ source under linux
|
|
Hi it's the 1st time I ask your help. I have an urgent problem: i'm preparing a little software in C++ with legOS for linux for an university exam: I make C++ libraries nor main file: in the Makefile.common file there's a macro that invoke (...) (25 years ago, 10-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Very interresting pages about works around the RCX
|
|
Hi, Just have a closer look : (URL) smart robots, homebrew sensors & actuators, projects,... Very good work made by them. - Christophe - (25 years ago, 10-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Serial talking between RCX and pc
|
|
Hi! Does anyone know how to make a pc and a RCX talk to each other? I've seen some examples of basic communication like downloading programs or 'turn on motor A'. But I've not seen a protocol, i.e. sending down data that is to be processed by the (...) (25 years ago, 10-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: another sensor multiplexer
|
|
thanks for the compliments Michael, but I see it more as an evolution , I used a lot of ideas of others (including yours), so you must have created one her "grand parents". Let's all continue to exchange and combine the ideas, to create new (...) (25 years ago, 9-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: BattleBricks
|
|
Will Gorman <willgorman@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:GBFt8L.F6F@lugnet.com... (...) I've been doing exactly this kind of thing with a few other people (all the robots are human-controlled, but mostly with wires) -- it seems fairly popular. (...) (25 years ago, 8-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: Help with Windows 2000 and nqc
|
|
Cycling through all of the Com ports with the nqc command (nqc -SCOM1,2,4 -d test.nqc) gives the message 'Could not open serial port' for each port tried. nqc -SCOM3 -d test.nqc gives the error 'no replay from RCX'. With the -v option, Com Ports 1,2 (...) (25 years ago, 8-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: Help with Windows 2000 and nqc
|
|
What com port is the tower attached to? By default, NQC assumes com port 1. If you use a different port, you'll need to specify it either with a -S option or by setting the RCX_PORT environment variable. For example, if you are using COM 2, you (...) (25 years ago, 8-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Help with Windows 2000 and nqc
|
|
(and all of the RCXcc updates) I have been happily using Linux to write nqc programs for over a year now, but I needed to migrate back to Windows 2000 for a while. So far, I can do everything I need except program my RCX! I loaded the Mindstorms (...) (25 years ago, 8-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | BattleBricks
|
|
Hello All, Just wanted to let you know about a site my friends and I put together. Check it out, and let me know what you think! www.battlebricks.com Will (25 years ago, 7-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: another sensor multiplexer
|
|
Calling that just "another sensor multiplexer" is a big understatement. It has to be the mother of all multiplexers. Nice work. Stef Mientki <s.mientki@ids.kun.nl> wrote in message news:3ACE4422.C15242....kun.nl... (...) (URL) (...) (25 years ago, 7-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | another sensor multiplexer
|
|
Features 3 potmeters 10 switches 3 external analog inputs 3 status LEDs test terminals (URL) Mientki (25 years ago, 6-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: Does 9719 include a adapter?
|
|
(...) No it doesn't, but any 12V AC *or* DC adapter will do (polarity is irrelevant). Matthias Jetleb VA3-MWJ (25 years ago, 6-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | RE: Does 9719 include a adapter?
|
|
No. (...) (25 years ago, 5-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Does 9719 include a adapter?
|
|
I got a new 9719 recently, but there is no adapter, I chcked the inventory of 9719, also no adapter, does 9719 include a adapter? Zhengrong (25 years ago, 5-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: baffled by a part in RIS 1.5
|
|
(...) from (...) for (...) and (...) Looking further, I note that the newton.meter is the preferred unit for the quantity "moment of force" (also known as torque). (25 years ago, 5-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: baffled by a part in RIS 1.5
|
|
I did'nt have the piece with me at the time I posted to lugnet, and yes Symbology is important. Increadibly, all of these mechanical aspects can be mapped out and calculated. It's just cool. (...) (25 years ago, 5-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: baffled by a part in RIS 1.5
|
|
(...) Using a unit of energy for torque would be very strange. You get an energy if you turn s.th. against a torque through some angle (expressed in radians, I think). Angles have no unit (or just 1), hence the units of torque and energy are equal. (...) (25 years ago, 5-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: baffled by a part in RIS 1.5
|
|
Don't punish yourself! At least you rendered the symbols from the gear correctly. There are at least four errors in the message I was responding to: (1) confusing the prefix n for nano with the unit symbol N for newton; (2) attaching two prefixes (...) (25 years ago, 4-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: baffled by a part in RIS 1.5
|
|
"Constantine Hannaher" <constantine.hannahe...shome.com> wrote in message news:GB7xrE.KJ3@lugnet.com... (...) Whoah! Thanks for the insights everybody! N.cm? This stuff is meant to be used by 12 year old kids? 27 year old kid hangs his head in (...) (25 years ago, 3-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
