|
|
 | | Re: disable LNP
|
| (...) Have the changes from the above thread been implemented in a release of BrickOS, yet? (reduced sensor sample rate) I need to D/L a new release, but I don't want to rush, because I know I'll have to make changes to some of my existing code. (...) (21 years ago, 10-Oct-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
| | | | | Re: disable LNP
|
| (...) Steve, If no IR traffic (of any kind) is occurring, then there is very little overhead associated with LNP being active. In any event, this trivial amount of overhead (in systime.c) can't be disabled. What you really need to be concerned about (...) (21 years ago, 10-Oct-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
| | | | | Re: Linked Lists in BrickOS
|
| (...) Michael, This will save you a few keystrokes: pNext = 0; :-) Mark (21 years ago, 10-Oct-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
| | | | | Re: Linked Lists in BrickOS
|
| (...) Actually, it turned out that there was some leftover obj or mak files that were messing up the compiler. I purged the directory, and all was well. Thanks for the tip on tabbing. Just wanted to confirm that a BrickOS pointer is only 2 bytes... (...) (21 years ago, 10-Oct-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
| | | | | Re: RCX Communications problems
|
| (...) the LNP class also uses LLC, it just doesn't implement receiveAck(). (...) You could work ACKs into LNP (e.g. create a LNPReliableHandler), or you could add multi-byte support into and put an addressing layer over LLCReliableHandler. The (...) (21 years ago, 9-Oct-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.java)
|
|
