 | | Re: NQC 2.0 ready for beta test
|
|
(...) The topic comes up from time to time. I'm *way* too busy with other projects to extend the firmware, but if someone else wanted to, I'd be willing to extend NQC as needed. If someone else is seriously interested in taking on this work, please (...) (25 years ago, 7-Aug-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: NQC 2.0 ready for beta test
|
|
NQC seems perfect right now, thanks ! But well, now nqc has all the features suported by the original rcx firmware, it should be very interesting to modify the existing firmware, in order to add new features, but still keeping ease of use of NQC. I (...) (25 years ago, 7-Aug-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: How do you convert light sensor data to bmp image
|
|
What could very exiting is to create a win32 software with spirit.ocx which could display in realtime the image on your screen... I'll work at it when i'll get the mindstorm... ---...--- Philippe Jadin mailto:philippe.jadin@skynet.be Belgium, Europe (...) (25 years ago, 6-Aug-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | NQC 2.0 ready for beta test
|
|
See the "beta testing" section of the NQC site: (URL) documentation is still somewhat minimal, but it should be enough for people to get started. Dave Baum (25 years ago, 6-Aug-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc, lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: LNP - lets get coding.
|
|
(...) Regarding where to go from here, if you step up to do the coding, I believe where to go is up to you. I don't know if that is how it usually works, but I certainly wouldn't want to be coding up something I am not happy with, so I would expect (...) (25 years ago, 1-Aug-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: LNP - lets get coding.
|
|
(...) I have just grabbed a copy - will have a look! Where do you suggest we go from here? I'm up for creating an initial API and getting some code cut (Within my limits - I know little/nothing about Linux & MacOS, and as yes LegOS). However, I'm (...) (25 years ago, 1-Aug-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: LNP - lets get coding.
|
|
(...) No, you didn't - I just didn't wanted to make sure I wasn't :) (...) This has already been done, for Librcx at least; don't know if anybody took a look at the code I put at: (URL) mentioned wanting to maybe take a look at that; porting to (...) (25 years ago, 31-Jul-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | LNP - lets get coding.
|
|
(...) Hi, Didn't mean to come across as arguing - sorry if I did! As you say, lets get coding LNP (My assumption is that the coding bit hasn't started yet, if it has, please accept my apologies & let me know how it is going!). I guess the things (...) (25 years ago, 31-Jul-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | emulegOS: quick bug fixes
|
|
I received this message by Mark Falco: (...) The site is now updated and emulegOS_unix.zip contains the new patched versions of ir-rover.cpp and irclient.tcl. The URL is: (URL) Mark Mario (URL) (25 years ago, 30-Jul-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | RE: LNP Repost
|
|
(...) I think Kekoa means that we should calculate the CRC16 and use only the high byte in the message, to save space. If we then tag the low byte on later, the old code expecting only the high byte won't break.... Cheers, Ralph Hempel - P.Eng (...) (25 years ago, 30-Jul-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
