 | | Re: lnp communication question
|
|
Hello Tobias, (...) Why do you think there's only 1 byte that can be sent? If your data buffer is longer, bytes are sent one-by-one serially in a packet... (...) look into lnp.c and you will see that both lnp_integrity_xxx and lnp_addressing_xxx are (...) (24 years ago, 15-May-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: serial port interrupts
|
|
(...) Actually that's what I was intending but I couldn't remember the words at my keyboard. To make debugging easier I will use parallel words that can be merged in later. I was going to use the following debugging strategy: Put the isr init in a (...) (24 years ago, 15-May-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
|
| |
| | due to popular demand
|
|
The HOWTO and other legOS archives will be available (until I get it to sourceforge) at (URL) for the people who wrote and volunteered to serve it- the archives now total something like ~100 meg (several different copies of compilers are in there) (...) (24 years ago, 15-May-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | lnp communication question
|
|
Hi! When using lnp_integrity_write(&data, length), what is the length argument used for? The data can only be one byte long if I understand it correctly. Can I use the length argument to send an additional byte of information? Is there anyway I can (...) (24 years ago, 14-May-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | RE: serial port interrupts
|
|
(...) Sounds good Steve, see notes below for some pointers... (...) Absolutely. All we have to do is enable the interrupts on the receiver throw the chars into a buffer. I'd keep the standard FORTH words that already exist so less system source (...) (24 years ago, 14-May-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
|
| |
| | serial port interrupts
|
|
Ralph, I'm getting tired of losing characters going to the RCX on the serial port because forth is busy. It is making my work more complex than it needs to be. If you are not going to do serial port interrupts I will take a shot at it if you give me (...) (24 years ago, 13-May-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
|
| |
| | Re: It's time to release some patches for LegOS 0.2.4
|
|
"Harald Mährer" <hmaehrer@debis.com> wrote in message news:391bcf0d.129529...net.com... (...) (URL) - on my NT i have more than one (logical) drive to keep system, (...) I have cygnwin in my NT partion and legOS in another one. No problem at all. I (...) (24 years ago, 13-May-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | RE: Factor upload script for user extensions
|
|
(...) Ummm, great idea. How about an item that turns into a pulldown list of 1-liners? I've got the X close or AltF4 shell closing capture thing, and I've also got XMODEM working. If I can get enough time, a public beta is in order... Cheers, Ralph (...) (24 years ago, 13-May-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
|
| |
| | Factor upload script for user extensions
|
|
Ralph, I suggest that you factor a proceedure out of the tcl uploadScript that sends a string to the RCX. This could then be used for additional menu or tcl commands that send Forth code to the RCX. Here is a potential implementation used to power (...) (24 years ago, 13-May-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
|
| |
| | Re: HOWTO going down
|
|
One other thing- this will of course mean that the various other files accessible at arthurdent.dorm.duke.edu will be unavailable. I will try to move as many of these as possible to legOS.sourceforge.net before I lose my ethernet connection, but I'm (...) (24 years ago, 13-May-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos, lugnet.robotics)
|
