 | | Re: Datalog with NQC 2.2 a1
|
|
(...) Yes, if I remember correctly the user space was 6.1 blocks. Regardless of how much free ram the system had. Dean -- Coin-Op's For Sale!: (URL) Lego Workshop: (URL) Lego Club: (URL) (24 years ago, 9-May-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: NQC 2.2 a1 available for public test
|
|
(...) I got e-mail a while back from mikest@corp.home.net who ported an older version of NQC to BEOS. I think the only change was a new serial port class (PSerial_beos.cpp) and some tweaks to the Makefile. You may want to contact him. If anybody (...) (24 years ago, 8-May-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: NQC 2.2 a1 available for public test
|
|
(...) I completely missed the fact that counters were overlapped with global vars. I'll have to come up with a good mechanism for allocating these. I think the scout handles things differently where the counters are actually unique from variables. (...) (24 years ago, 8-May-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: Datalog with NQC 2.2 a1
|
|
(...) The datalog appears to work fine, and you still have the same amount of program/datalog space. There was a ton of unused RAM in the older firmware, so Lego was able to pack a lot of new features in without reducing the user space. Dave Baum (24 years ago, 8-May-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: Web based control
|
|
I did this a while back by calling functions in the spirit.ocx from an ASP page. I used it to control a webcam I made with an RCX and an old QuickCam. I ran it with Personal WebServer on a '95 box and IIS4.0 on my NT Server, but perhaps you can use (...) (24 years ago, 8-May-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx, lugnet.robotics.tele)
|
| |
| | Getting started
|
|
(...) Hmm... Which OS are you using? Configuring the terminal window is easy once you know the magic incantation 2400 baud, no parity, 1 stop bit, no handshaking. Ralph forgot to document that so you have to learn it from this or several other posts (...) (24 years ago, 8-May-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
|
| |
| | BEOS Version of NQC?
|
|
Is there anyone out there that would be interested in creating and maintaining a version of NQC for BEOS? Dean -- Coin-Op's For Sale!: (URL) Lego Workshop: (URL) Lego Club: (URL) (24 years ago, 8-May-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | updated nqc man page
|
|
I've made a preliminary man page for nqc 2.2. (URL) (Hastily converted to HTML at (URL).) It mentions 2.2.r1 -- my thinking is to target the man page at the actual releases, not the alpha.... Comments? Errors? (24 years ago, 8-May-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: Web based control
|
|
(...) To answer my own question there is a group called lugnet.robotics.tele that is for the above use. Dean -- Coin-Op's For Sale!: (URL) Lego Workshop: (URL) Lego Club: (URL) (24 years ago, 8-May-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx, lugnet.robotics.tele)
|
| |
| | Re: Web based control
|
|
(...) There are a few of us working on the best solution. Maybe we can all get together and pool our resources. I'll ask Todd to create an WEB Control news group. Dean -- Coin-Op's For Sale!: (URL) Lego Workshop: (URL) Lego Club: (URL) (24 years ago, 8-May-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: Standard extension suggestions
|
|
(...) >Let me describe how I program on the RCX and it (...) Actually, it's this first bit that I find intimidating...the forth part sounds fun. Jeff jeffrey.hazen@northmill.net (24 years ago, 8-May-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
|
| |
| | Re: NQC 2.2 a1 available for public test
|
|
Working code using a counter. /* * lstop8.nqc - Line and Wall avoider * * Copyright (C) 2000 James Pritchard * * Date: 08-May 2000 * * * The contents of this file are subject to the Mozilla Public License * Version 1.0 (the "License"); you may not (...) (24 years ago, 8-May-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Web based control
|
|
I apologize if this question has been asked and answered, but searching through this group did not provide a solid answer. Can this be done.. I have a linux box running as a webserver. I would like to plug the IR unit to the serial port and be able (...) (24 years ago, 8-May-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: Standard extension suggestions
|
|
(...) It is hard for me to tell. It is not hard for me but I am a programmer with many years under his belt. However forth seems idealy suited for someone getting started. It is a very interactive environment which encourages experimentation. Let me (...) (24 years ago, 8-May-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
|
| |
| | RE: Standard extension suggestions
|
|
I think this would be a good idea, even if they never incorporated into the "official" kernel. Sort of a code repository similar to what has been proposed for NQC. That said, the thing that intimidates me is my lack of any experience with the (...) (24 years ago, 8-May-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
|
| |
| | Standard extension suggestions
|
|
I suggest that we collectively create a standard extension package that makes life a little simpler for beginners or maybe for developers in general. I have already started what I would use but it occured to me that this might be of general value. (...) (24 years ago, 8-May-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
|
| |
| | Re: NQC 2.2 a1 available for public test
|
|
There is still a problem when nqc uses the first three global variables if you also want to use a counter. The current solution is to make the first int lines reflect the fact that they will be used as counters. #Define COUNTER_1 0 int count1 int (...) (24 years ago, 8-May-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | New firmware and ROBOLAB
|
|
Hi, LEGO has got a new firmware version for the RCX. (URL) is still alpha, but I want to know if firm0326.lgo runs with ROBOLAB. Ralf (24 years ago, 8-May-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.robolab)
|
| |
| | Datalog with NQC 2.2 a1
|
|
Hi, has anybody tested the datalog with NQC 2.2 a1. Since the file firm0326.lgo is larger than the file firm0309.lgo, surely fewer ram will remain for storing the datalog. Is there any chance to get the number of free space? Ralf (24 years ago, 8-May-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: NQC 2.2 a1 available for public test
|
|
Hi Dave, no there is no mistake in NQC. Sorry if I confused you. I 've found a mistake in my samples #5 to #8. I wanted to show that you can use a variable i as a parameter with the function Display(i, 0). My mistake was that I copied the code from (...) (24 years ago, 8-May-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
