 | | Re: Constructopedia v1.0
|
|
(...) Jason, I currently have an item running on Ebay called "LEGO Mindstorms Constructopedia v 1.0". Current best offer is at $1.99. Check the link below: (URL) Anikanov anikanov@usa.net or vanikano@haywire.csuhayward.edu (26 years ago, 14-Nov-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Mindfest Extreme Mindstorms
|
|
Here is a little page (actually two pages) of notes and stuff from Mindfest. No pictures - that's already been done. The summary of the 2 (or 3) days is: (URL) and the text of my opening remarks is: (URL) Have fun... Cheers, Ralph Hempel - P.Eng (...) (26 years ago, 13-Nov-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth, lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Building a MazeWalker
|
|
Ok. You have heard me blather on about how I will eventually get the mazewalker posted. The code isn't posted YET, but the pictures and text are...here's the link. (URL) This is a complete maze navigation system. It figures out where the boundaries (...) (26 years ago, 13-Nov-99, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
|
| |
| | Re: RIS 1.0 to 1.5 software upgrade
|
|
Rich, I originally thought that the free upgrade was a software only upgrade. I thought that's what I saw on the MindStorms web site several months ago. I was surprised when I received the free upgrade to get the full upgrade kit that sells for (...) (26 years ago, 13-Nov-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx, lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | legOS-0.2.2 and C++
|
|
in the old legOS-0.1.7 there was this first-c++ demo program. I don't see it in latest version of legOS. however the sensor class is still there... what's the status on all this (parts of legOS being in C++)? does it work at all? (yes, I can try it (...) (26 years ago, 13-Nov-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: RIS 1.0 to 1.5 software upgrade
|
|
(...) Now I'm confused again... I've been told that the 1.0->1.5 upgrade includes some parts (a clutch gear, IIRC from an earlier thread) as well as software. Quoting Doug Wilcox: (...) which implies that the upgrade comes with pieces.... (26 years ago, 13-Nov-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx, lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | RE: Save image in pbForth (srec version)
|
|
Sergey, I'll add the other basic wordlist stuff to the kernel, then I'll let the users "build" the optional system to their needs. In fact, I have three extra files that I assemble into a complete kernel. The RCX definitions (all assembler) (...) (26 years ago, 13-Nov-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
|
| |
| | Re: Save image in pbForth (srec version)
|
|
Hi Ralph, (...) Well, I meant that I know how to do it, but not yet tried ;) Also, it shouldn't be so difficult, so I will try it now. (...) Thanks for "really good forth coding", I can only say "I did my best" ;) Seriously, manage it as you think (...) (26 years ago, 12-Nov-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
|
| |
| | Re: Use PC's IR port instead of IR tower?
|
|
The basic difference between PCs/PalmPilots/WinCE IR ports and the RCX is a different physical transmission/modulation protocol. In the PC etc case the commonly used format is described by the IrDa standard (www.irda.org) where seperate IR pulses (...) (26 years ago, 12-Nov-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | RE: Save image in pbForth (srec version)
|
|
(...) Oh, you mean that you can save the system dictionary up to the point of the SAVE_SYSTEM stuff that is at the end of the dictionary? Great! (...) I think a SAVE_SYSTEM script that is loaded in just before the system is to be saved is right. I (...) (26 years ago, 12-Nov-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
|
