 | | Bluetooth: Limited to 5?
|
|
I have a class of 10 kids each trying to fire up a remote control via bluetooth to their respective robots. Seems there is a limit of 5 connections to a room? Can anyone confirm? (15 years ago, 19-Aug-11, to lugnet.robotics.nxt)
|
| |
| | NXT-G and random number usage
|
|
OK, so I'm on my second ever NXT project, and I am wondering if this is even possible. I have a program that currently has 3 WAIT Blocks, each set to different lengths of time (4 sec, 2 sec, 1 sec) at different points. What I want to do, to add more (...) (15 years ago, 25-May-11, to lugnet.robotics.nxt)
|
| |
| | NXT 1.0 models in NXT 2.0?
|
|
I have both 1.0 and 2.0 NXT sets, and I'd like to have all of the models from both versions of the software to appear. I thought I could install both and I'd get both sets of models, but I can't install the 1.0 software- it tells me that I need at (...) (15 years ago, 19-Nov-10, to lugnet.robotics.nxt)
|
| |
| | Re: Machine Made of Lego Builds Anything You Want — Out of Lego
|
|
(...) Thanks John, that's really cool. BTW if anyone is having trouble with the page in that link, try this one instead: (URL). Also added a couple of other groups. ROSCO (15 years ago, 21-Oct-10, to lugnet.mediawatch, lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics.nxt, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Text languages for programming NXT?
|
|
(...) Last year I tried using RobotC on an RCX, and found it to be buggy and no longer maintained. It worked very well on the NXT, but I was looking for something affordable that I could use in a classroom environment, and that made it easy to (...) (16 years ago, 10-Sep-10, to lugnet.robotics.nxt)
|
| |
| | Re: Text languages for programming NXT?
|
|
I'm getting back into Mindstorms after a long hiatus. Let me resurrect this old thread, to see what the answer is in 2010. :-) What text-based languages are most mature and best-supported these days for programming RCX and NXT? Is RobotC still (...) (16 years ago, 28-Aug-10, to lugnet.robotics.nxt)
|
| |
| | Re: NXT Newbie "Is it possible" question
|
|
(...) I'm not sure how much time you have, or what resources... but you might be able to do this with a single set. If you put an arm on each motor, such that "track A" would hit a peg and turn the motor clockwise, but "Track B" would hit a peg on (...) (16 years ago, 24-Aug-10, to lugnet.robotics.nxt)
|
| |
| | Re: NXT Newbie "Is it possible" question
|
|
(...) Well, just for diversity here's a slightly different approach. Make the first block a "Reset Timer" block, then split the program into four sequences. Each is simply a "Wait for Touch Sensor", followed by "Read Timer" block with the result (...) (16 years ago, 24-Aug-10, to lugnet.robotics.nxt)
|
| |
| | Re: NXT Newbie "Is it possible" question
|
|
Thanks Kevin! That gives me a good start. once I get some sort of working model, I'll share with world for some good old fashion criticism. Chris (16 years ago, 19-Aug-10, to lugnet.robotics.nxt)
|
| |
| | Re: How is this?
|
|
(...) Yes, change the "wait for 9" to be a "check for 9", and the problem should go away... Loop forever if Touched and distance < 9 { turn on motor } else { turn off motor } Kevin (16 years ago, 19-Aug-10, to lugnet.robotics.nxt)
|
