Results 201 – 220 of about 800.
|
Search took 0.01 CPU seconds.
|
|
 | | Re: MOC: Working solar powered rover and geiger counter
|
| (...) This would not be difficult - if you scroll down to the bottom schematic, it is colour-coded into sections according to function, with the last third of the circuit being all that you need to make a switch to activate and run the RCX from some (...) (19 years ago, 10-Feb-06, to lugnet.robotics)
| |
|  
event
(score: 0.414)
|
|
| | Re: MOC: Working solar powered rover and geiger counter
|
| (...) Thank you :) I don't have a schematic (more like a few pages of illegible notes :) and the gieger counter sensor isn't something that's easy to make a useful schematic for anyway because of unusual parts that vary in key properties, and the (...) (19 years ago, 8-Feb-06, to lugnet.robotics)
| |
|
event
(score: 0.414)
|
|
| | Re: What I would do (2)
|
| (...) I like this concept, but what if in the case of NQC the new firmware turns out to be such a radically different design that it makes it extremely difficult, if not impossible, to carry over very much of the rather large API built into NQC to (...) (19 years ago, 31-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
| |
|
event
(score: 0.413)
|
|
| | Re: What I would do (2)
|
| (...) If the mechnisms for control are still applicable, then yeah, you could port over the code that is used to activate the various sensors. In terms of uCOS, after reading half of the kernel book and actually working with it a little bit (the (...) (19 years ago, 26-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
| |
|
event
(score: 0.413)
|
|
| | Re: What I would do (2)
|
| (...) Didn't say it was! :-)! (...) Bingo! (...) I'm running it now and its quite a nice little OS. Like we both said, the real work is just asking tasks to manage the specific resources of the NXT. (...) Again, totally agree (as I stated in my last (...) (19 years ago, 27-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
| |
|
event
(score: 0.413)
|
|
| | Re: Why java is (not) bad for Mindstorms
|
| (...) Well my understaing of JIT compiler is that its a part of the actual runtime so I'm not sure how it would be on the PC?! Though you got me thinking (dangerous), perhaps the best way to program the NXT is not to run a binary but instead use an (...) (19 years ago, 24-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
| |
|
event
(score: 0.412)
|
|
| |
|
event
(score: 0.412)
|
|
| |
|
event
(score: 0.412)
|
|
| |
|
event
(score: 0.412)
|
|
| | Re: mindscript - subroutines
|
| (...) Ron, I am fairly new to the mindscript language as well, but I have done substantial research into this problem as I was encountering the exact same problem. From what I have found, you cannot do user subroutines in mindscript FOR THE RCX. (...) (19 years ago, 23-Dec-05, to lugnet.robotics)
| |
|
event
(score: 0.410)
|
|
| | Re: Remington: my Brickfest05 Super-Mega Sumobot
|
| Steve/All, I just found this followup; I'd somehow missed it back in October. Many apologies, please don't read anything into the delay... (...) Yes, the roller is intended to detect (lack of) motion. It turns out it didn't help me much in the (...) (19 years ago, 27-Dec-05, to lugnet.robotics)
| |
|
event
(score: 0.409)
|
|
| |
|
event
(score: 0.408)
|
|
| | Re: avoid messaging
|
| (...) If you have an event waiting for a message, I doubt it will have much impact on the speed of the rest of the program. However, this will not catch the messages you're looking for. You can't use the "mail" function to receive op-code, such as (...) (19 years ago, 5-Dec-05, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.robolab, lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
| |
|
event
(score: 0.408)
|
|
| | New contest: Was Design
|
| Peter, Everyone interested. The thread (fractured as it was) was getting a bit long to quote everyone, so I thought I'd start this new one. Yes, Peter, I agree with 99% of all that you have stated. I think the 'boys' toy model works, even if only (...) (19 years ago, 4-Dec-05, to lugnet.robotics)
| |
|
event
(score: 0.407)
|
|
| | Re: Design
|
| Steve, I agree, the Turing test is not up to date, and even in its time did not indicate intelligence accurately, though I would go so far as to say that those intelligent programs that might pass the Turing test won't pass the test of demonstrating (...) (19 years ago, 6-Dec-05, to lugnet.robotics)
| |
|
event
(score: 0.407)
|
|
| |
|
event
(score: 0.407)
|
|
| | Re: Custom Sensor poll (Re: Mindstorms on Slashdot)
|
| (...) I'm not sure about that. Rob's trick is great - I've used it myself, and probably will again (I tend toward the end of "purist", although I confess some of this may not be high moral standards, but laziness). But I would say that solution is (...) (19 years ago, 2-Dec-05, to lugnet.robotics)
| |
|
event
(score: 0.407)
|
|
| | Re: Mindstorms on Slashdot
|
| Just a minor thing, Mr S is me, not Steve H. Also, I have given some thought to what I would really want out of Mindstorms part 3, or Lego Advance, as it were. Motor kit in 1,2,and 3 motor variants, including mounting plates and choice of wire (...) (19 years ago, 1-Dec-05, to lugnet.robotics)
| |
|
event
(score: 0.407)
|
|
| |
|
event
(score: 0.406)
|
|
| |
|
event
(score: 0.406)
|
More: Next Page >>
|
