Subject:
|
Re: How advanced can RCX programming be?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Mon, 10 Jan 2000 23:31:29 GMT
|
Original-From:
|
metzboi3104@aol&Spamless&.com
|
Viewed:
|
499 times
|
| |
|
|
> I hate to see this about a toy I've had so much fun with, but it isn't
> likely that (esp. once you upgrade to pbForth or legOS) you'll feel
> limited by software, even with the 32K limitation. The big limitation is
> hardware. The sensors (esp. once you try to do anything with any kind of
> precision) are an unreliable mess, and the fact that you can only use
> three of them makes it difficult to do anything of any serious
> computational complexity.
You just have to know how to use what it comes with. It's really not that
hard!
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: How advanced can RCX programming be?
|
| (...) Unfortunately, it really is. The most egregious examples are of course the light sensors, which a) are only vaguely linear b) don't have any resolution at the high and low end and c) (worst) when measuring a constant light source, will vary by (...) (25 years ago, 11-Jan-00, to lugnet.robotics)
|
3 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
