Subject:
|
Re: How advanced can RCX programming be?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Tue, 11 Jan 2000 02:13:37 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
811 times
|
| |
|
|
Luis Villa wrote:
> P.S. Alex, I too enjoy the mechanical end a lot. I can use mechanics to
> (sort of) fix the rotation and touch sensors. I'm stuck with the poor
> light sensors, no matter what, and that sort of stinks.
With the light gizmo from extreme creatures and some ingenuity you
might be able to get more mileage out of your light sensor. Although I
personally have found it adequate for the task everyone seems to use it
for: detecting the presense or absence of a specific colour.
alex
(I'm not alex wetmore)
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: How advanced can RCX programming be?
|
| (...) Unfortunately, it really is. The most egregious examples are of course the light sensors, which a) are only vaguely linear b) don't have any resolution at the high and low end and c) (worst) when measuring a constant light source, will vary by (...) (25 years ago, 11-Jan-00, to lugnet.robotics)
|
3 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
