Subject:
|
Re: First Lego League Software
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Wed, 22 Dec 1999 16:52:32 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
mattdm@mattdm.#saynotospam#org
|
Viewed:
|
630 times
|
| |
|
|
lego-robotics@crynwr.com <lego-robotics@crynwr.com> wrote:
> Its not silly at all. It has to do with what is available for use within a
> classroom that is supported by curriculum, resources and activities. It is
> very difficult for most teachers to do these kinds of projects without proper
Sure, but why should those teachers/students able to use NQC be banned? I
can (perhaps) understand banning it for being too powerful, but if that were
the case, Robolab should be banned too.
--
Matthew Miller ---> mattdm@mattdm.org
Quotes 'R' Us ---> http://quotes-r-us.org/
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: First Lego League Software
|
| I agree that it is a problem. In fact, I didn't know Robolab could use variables. So it was unfair, though not hugely so. This is something FLL needs to address, because the lack of variables is really a big flaw, and very hard to explain to the (...) (25 years ago, 22-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: First Lego League Software
|
| In a message dated 12/22/99 10:41:28 AM Eastern Standard Time, mattdm@mattdm.org writes: << It's silly to allow RoboLab and not NQC. Robolab also supports variables and is also a lot more powerful than the RIS software. And, it's an extra cost (...) (25 years ago, 22-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
7 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
