Subject:
|
Re: First Lego League Software
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Wed, 22 Dec 1999 15:52:02 GMT
|
Original-From:
|
DANL08@AOL.COMstopspammers
|
Viewed:
|
395 times
|
| |
|
|
In a message dated 12/22/99 10:41:28 AM Eastern Standard Time,
mattdm@mattdm.org writes:
<< It's silly to allow RoboLab and not NQC. Robolab also supports variables
and is
also a lot more powerful than the RIS software. And, it's an extra cost
thing. NQC is available for free to anyone. >>
Its not silly at all. It has to do with what is available for use within a
classroom that is supported by curriculum, resources and activities. It is
very difficult for most teachers to do these kinds of projects without proper
support. While NCQ is great for AFOLs, it really does not have the level of
support that Dacta provides with RoboLab. This is not a matter of simply
software, but of allowing students to have good experiences with the MS
products.
DAN
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: First Lego League Software
|
| (...) Sure, but why should those teachers/students able to use NQC be banned? I can (perhaps) understand banning it for being too powerful, but if that were the case, Robolab should be banned too. (25 years ago, 22-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
7 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
