Subject:
|
Re: Functional languages and/or RCX wrapper code
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Mon, 15 Nov 1999 20:25:43 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
571 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.robotics, Brian Connors writes:
> Well, I've been taking a look at
> Kekoa's send.c, and as long as Kekoa's cool with it
> I'm trying to slice and dice it into an API called
> Seance (basically factoring out his comm functions
> from the rest of the program), this with an eye
> towards possibly reimplementing spirit.ocx as a
> platform-independent C library called Spectre.
That is an interesting idea! let me know some more details, please!
/Vlad
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Functional languages and/or RCX wrapper code
|
| (...) I am interested also. I started s similar project with the intent of allowing my HP LX200 (A DOS palmtop) to communicate to the RCX directly, with the hopes of mounting the LX200 alongside the RCX. WIth 2MB of RAM it has the resources to do (...) (25 years ago, 15-Nov-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Functional languages and/or RCX wrapper code
|
| On the subject of functional programming on the RCX -- it sort of depends on how you define functional. If you want an API binding from a functional language, that's one thing; I think that's what Haskell/Lego is all about if I read the page (...) (25 years ago, 15-Nov-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
4 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
Active threads in Robotics
|
|
|
|
|
|
