 | | Functional languages and/or RCX wrapper code —Brian Connors
|
| | | On the subject of functional programming on the RCX -- it sort of depends on how you define functional. If you want an API binding from a functional language, that's one thing; I think that's what Haskell/Lego is all about if I read the page (...) (25 years ago, 15-Nov-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Functional languages and/or RCX wrapper code —Vlad Dumitrescu
|
| | | | | (...) That is an interesting idea! let me know some more details, please! /Vlad (25 years ago, 15-Nov-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Functional languages and/or RCX wrapper code —Wes Matchett
|
| | | | | | (...) I am interested also. I started s similar project with the intent of allowing my HP LX200 (A DOS palmtop) to communicate to the RCX directly, with the hopes of mounting the LX200 alongside the RCX. WIth 2MB of RAM it has the resources to do (...) (25 years ago, 15-Nov-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Functional languages and/or RCX wrapper code —Dave Baum
|
| | | | (...) You may want to take a look at some or all of the rcxlib portion of the NQC source ((URL) It already includes a portable comm implementation across Win/Mac/Unix. I think its also a bit more robust in terms of communication protocol than the (...) (25 years ago, 15-Nov-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
