Subject:
|
Re: Lego Protocol Patent
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Wed, 3 Nov 1999 17:45:45 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
736 times
|
| |
|
|
Ralph Hempel <rhempel@bmts.com> wrote:
> Good grief! Maybe I should get involved in patent law (or at least spec'ing
> for patent lawyers).
>
> Honestly, the basic protocol that is described has been implemented LOTS of
> times in small proprietary projects.
I agree with everything you've said, Ralph.
My turn to say somthing about patents. I know the job of being a patent
clerk must be amazingly difficult -- how can any person possibly know about
enough prior art to tell the obvious from the obscure from the ingenious --
but sometimes there are claims in patents never cease to amaze me, and this
patent in particular contains several such claims. Now at the same time, I
think I see what TLG is afraid of and why they would want a patent like
this.
Now I'm not a lawyer, but it seems to me there are several claims in the
patent that are so broad they are ridiculous. If you keep reading though,
you'll find that the claims get more and more specific to Mindstorms. See
e.g claims 4 and 5 and the others that are similarly worded. Not to say
that the scheme described in those claims has or hasn't been used before,
but if anybody knows of a previous system that worked that way, that person
knows too much about communications protocols.
The point of the patent, I believe, is not to preserve the brilliance of
the communications protocol, but is instead to thwart, to some extent or
another, a competitor from selling a compatible product. Unclear but
doubtful that the patent will prevent a determined competitor from selling
a similar product.
This being the first message I can recall posting since Mindfest, I should
say that that event was very fun, worth going to, etc. I enjoyed meeting
everybody, attaching faces and personalities to various projects and
newsgroup postings, and being surprised that a set of plastic bricks could
bring so many friendly and like-minded people together for an enjoyable
weekend. Everybody I met had something interesting to say or share.
Amazing.
-Kekoa
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Lego Protocol Patent
|
| (...) In theory, patents are only allowed for inventions that are "novel and unique". This means that if someone trained in a given field, with access to all published literature and knowledge, when faced with the same problem could reasonably be (...) (25 years ago, 4-Nov-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | RE: Lego Protocol Patent
|
| (...) Good grief! Maybe I should get involved in patent law (or at least spec'ing for patent lawyers). Honestly, the basic protocol that is described has been implemented LOTS of times in small proprietary projects. In fact, the fire alarm system (...) (25 years ago, 3-Nov-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
6 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
