Subject:
|
Re: Kego Constructopedia
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Wed, 8 Sep 1999 23:01:33 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
751 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.robotics, Brian Alano writes:
> If we like Constructopedia, but are worried about [trademark]
> infringement, how about Constructopaedia?
I am reminded of the fake ROLEX(r) watches that say "ROIEX" hoping no-one will
notice. I don't care if it would hold up in court or not, that's just plain
sleazy (-:
No, as long as we're in the toy, educational, or educational toy areas we
should just use a totally different word or phrase.
If it were up to me, it would just be a generic descriptive phrase like
"glossary of sub-assemblies". Good thing it isn't up to me <-8
- Robert Munafo http://www.mrob.com/
LEGO: TC+++(8480) SW++ #+ S-- LS++ Hsp M+ A@ LM++ YB64m IC13
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Kego Constructopedia
|
| How about those below or with any other combinations Lexical +... ( Graphics + Lego) lLexiCON lLexis Lexis-G Lexicon-G Lexis-lBody or lDesign Partterns lShape Grammar ----- Original Message ----- From: Robert Munafo <munafo@gcctechNO.SPAMcom> To: (...) (25 years ago, 8-Sep-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
Message is in Reply To:
10 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
