 | | Re: FW: Something else is needed, I think... —Laurentino Martins
|
| | | (...) What about instead of creating a full featured firmware that will never be good enough for *everything* we want to do, we create a dynamic firmware downloader that we could specify what we would want to download? I could say for instants that (...) (25 years ago, 4-May-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: FW: Something else is needed, I think... —John A. Tamplin
|
| | | | | (...) Precisely. The JVM class loader already provides that functionality. Say for example, you want the various math functions, you have java.math loaded. If you want a fancy package that interprets the raw sensor data for you, load (...) (25 years ago, 4-May-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: FW: Something else is needed, I think... —Paul Speed
|
| | | | (...) Is it just me, or is this starting to sound alot like LegOS? :) -Paul (pspeed@progeeks.com) -- Did you check the web site first?: (URL) (25 years ago, 4-May-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: FW: Something else is needed, I think... —Ray Kelm
|
| | | | (...) Why not implement an interpreter that is linked with LegOS? -- Did you check the web site first?: (URL) (25 years ago, 5-May-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: FW: Something else is needed, I think... —John A. Tamplin
|
| | | | (...) Whatever interpreter is decided on, an OS will be required. Depending on the requirements of that interpreter, particularly in terms of memory allocation (and garbage collection) and threading support, LegOS may be a fine base for it. On the (...) (25 years ago, 5-May-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
