Subject:
|
Re: Memory
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Sun, 7 Feb 1999 08:38:49 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1040 times
|
| |
|
|
One problem that I think of right off is the H8300 has a maximum address
space of 64kb. Granted, that's alot more memory than we have right now,
but I just thought I'd bring it up.
Gord Goebel wrote:
>
> Has anyone thought about increasing the memory capacity of an RCX (or is
> there simply not enough room inside the box)?
>
> --
> "It is better to ask a 'stupid question' than to make a stupid mistake."
--
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Ryan J. Evans Box 2026/Brown Univ.
Brown University Providence, RI 02912
Ryan_Evans@brown.edu (401)863-5453
"Why settle something with words when you can settle it with a
flamethrower?"
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | RE: Memory
|
| Although I think adding memory can be worthwhile I would like to add a point of perspective. I have several friends who used to work at Cincinnati Milacron writing software for the robots they manufacture. When I told them the RCX had 32KB they (...) (26 years ago, 7-Feb-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Memory
|
| Has anyone thought about increasing the memory capacity of an RCX (or is there simply not enough room inside the box)? -- "It is better to ask a 'stupid question' than to make a stupid mistake." (26 years ago, 7-Feb-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
15 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
