Subject:
|
Re: Why java is bad for Mindstorms
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Sun, 22 Jan 2006 10:50:33 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1853 times
|
| |
|
|
Hi Kevin,
> Given the structure of your argument/conclusion, then you would also believe
> that NQC was a bad thing, and I'd have to disagree there too. I doubt I am
> alone.
Hm, you got me:) Nqc is fantastic. But the success comes from the fact
that you get an easy and elegant to use visual interface and can stand
as close as possible to the original, unaltered system.
> Please reread the on-line WIRED article again [...]
I didn't know it is online. I have heared about the Wired acticle here
in the group but live in Germany, so it takes some weeks for the real
Wired to show up at my newsstand.
> Now sit and think about where LEGO was at the release of the RCX. No
> comparison.
And it seems that LEGO uses its possibilites in a great way.
...and now I have to hurry to wired.com...
Regards,
Michael
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Why java is bad for Mindstorms
|
| (...) Hi Michael, While I agree with much of what your argue above, I disagree with your conclusion. The better the official language for NXT, the more diverse the users and universal the solutions. Better the language the more people can play with (...) (19 years ago, 21-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
6 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
Active threads in Robotics
|
|
|
|
|
|
