Subject:
|
Re: Why java is bad for Mindstorms
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Mon, 23 Jan 2006 04:22:07 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1734 times
|
| |
![Post a public reply to this message](/news/icon-reply.gif) | |
In lugnet.robotics, Ross Crawford wrote:
> In lugnet.robotics, John Hansen wrote:
> > If it is harder to learn, less feature rich,
> > and less powerful then it should not be used, regardless of its official
> > sanction by LEGO.
>
> That's a lot of ifs... and I for one can't wait till I get a chance to find
> out whether they're true or not :)
I hope all of the MUPs and lucky MDP participants aren't disappointed. :-)
John Hansen
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
6 Messages in This Thread: ![Why java is bad for Mindstorms -Michael Obenland (21-Jan-06 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Why java is bad for Mindstorms -Kevin L. Clague (21-Jan-06 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Why java is bad for Mindstorms -Michael Obenland (22-Jan-06 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Why java is bad for Mindstorms -John Hansen (22-Jan-06 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Why java is bad for Mindstorms -Ross Crawford (22-Jan-06 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![You are here](/news/here.gif)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|