Subject:
|
Re: Why java is bad for Mindstorms
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Sun, 22 Jan 2006 21:25:38 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1576 times
|
| |
![Post a public reply to this message](/news/icon-reply.gif) | |
In lugnet.robotics, John Hansen wrote:
> If it is harder to learn, less feature rich,
> and less powerful then it should not be used, regardless of its official
> sanction by LEGO.
That's a lot of ifs... and I for one can't wait till I get a chance to find out
whether they're true or not :)
ROSCO
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
![](/news/x.gif) | | Re: Why java is bad for Mindstorms
|
| (...) As of early 2003 (and even going back to 2002) BricxCC had extensive support for compiling and downloading brickOS programs. Exactly when in 2003 I first released my installers for brickOS and cygwin I don't recall but they made using brickOS (...) (18 years ago, 22-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
6 Messages in This Thread: ![Why java is bad for Mindstorms -Michael Obenland (21-Jan-06 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Why java is bad for Mindstorms -Kevin L. Clague (21-Jan-06 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Why java is bad for Mindstorms -Michael Obenland (22-Jan-06 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Why java is bad for Mindstorms -John Hansen (22-Jan-06 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![You are here](/news/here.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Why java is bad for Mindstorms -John Hansen (23-Jan-06 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|