 | | new newsgroup for NXT
|
|
Shall we create one? lugnet.robotics.nxt -Suz (19 years ago, 6-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: new newsgroup for NXT
|
|
(...) Whooo...ooo Hooo...ooo! e (19 years ago, 6-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: new newsgroup for NXT
|
|
(...) Good idea Suz. ROSCO (19 years ago, 6-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: new newsgroup for NXT
|
|
Now we just need a curator (or 4) ;-) -Suz (19 years ago, 6-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.curators)
|
| |
| | Re: new newsgroup for NXT
|
|
(...) I nominate John Barnes. :) e (19 years ago, 6-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.curators)
|
| |
| | Re: new newsgroup for NXT
|
|
(...) I thought 'lugnet.robotics' newsgroup covers everything that have to do with Mindstorms? Then again ...there isn't a newsgroup called 'lugnet.mindstorms'? I think it good idea to add 'lugnet.mindstorms' newsgroup. I am assuming it would cover (...) (19 years ago, 6-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: new newsgroup for NXT
|
|
(...) Well, there isn't really a hurry. The beasts won't be on sale until August. I think that before we split the group in two (which can be damaging to the usefulness of the group when we AREN'T talking about specific computers, motors and (...) (19 years ago, 6-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: new newsgroup for NXT
|
|
(...) I second that. Actually, is there a great deal of NXT stuff that should be separate from the RCX stuff? Maybe another group isn't required. Steve (19 years ago, 6-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.curators)
|
| |
| | Re: new newsgroup for NXT
|
|
Steve Hassenplug writes: > Actually, is there a great deal of NXT stuff that should be > separate from the RCX stuff? Maybe another group isn't required. Don't split the community. That would be bad. Time will tell if there needs to be a separate (...) (19 years ago, 7-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: new newsgroup for NXT
|
|
(...) The thing is there are already RCX, Scout, Microscout, spybotics, and cybermastger sub-groups, and it hasn't hurt anything. Kev (19 years ago, 7-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: new newsgroup for NXT
|
|
(...) How do you know? Perhaps topics discussed on one of those lists would have been of tremendous value to someone on one of the other lists - since that person didn't see the message, they'd never know that they'd suffered. It's hard to prove a (...) (19 years ago, 7-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: new newsgroup for NXT
|
|
(...) Lugnet in the past, IIRC, has created new newsgroups as soon as it was clear that there was a separate category, rather than waiting till close to or even after release. Thus, if I'm remembering correctly, there's precedent. (19 years ago, 7-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: new newsgroup for NXT
|
|
(...) Thanks for the comments. After reading them and thinking more about this, I'd prefer we do not create the new group. Some explanation: In the past, groups have been created of two general types: those for "product lines" which were created (...) (19 years ago, 8-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.admin.general)
|
