| | Re: $60 for RCX 1.0 and Serial Tower Jack Hawk
|
| | (...) I guess I'm mistaken. I could have sworn the box said 1.5, but it clearly says 1.0 on the brick. I lost the box to see where my confusion is. I'll go back to lurking now. --Jack ___...___ Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005 (URL) (19 years ago, 12-Oct-05, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | |
| | | | Re: $60 for RCX 1.0 and Serial Tower Steve Hassenplug
|
| | | | (...) no need. Actually, I think many (if not all) of the 1.5s were marked with 1.0. Steve (19 years ago, 12-Oct-05, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
| | | | Re: $60 for RCX 1.0 and Serial Tower Chio Siong Soh
|
| | | | (...) The confusion is that the nos. 1.0, 1.5 and 2.0 properly refers to the RIS sets, viz: #9719 Robotics Invention System 1.0 ((URL) Robotics Invention System 1.5 ((URL) Robotics Invention system 2.0 ((URL) for the RCX (programmable brick) itself, (...) (19 years ago, 13-Oct-05, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: $60 for RCX 1.0 and Serial Tower Juergen Stuber
|
| | | | Hi, (...) you can still get those from LEGO Dacta, either separately or as part of some Dacta sets (but they ain't cheap). Cheers Jürgen (19 years ago, 13-Oct-05, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: $60 for RCX 1.0 and Serial Tower Chio Siong Soh
|
| | | | (...) Oh, oh! You do mean RCX 1.0 with socket for AC adapter don't you? Yes, the LEGO Mindstorms for Schools sets come with RCX 1.0 with the AC adapter socket ((URL) Many of the school projects are stationary robots and often require the RCX to be (...) (19 years ago, 14-Oct-05, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: $60 for RCX 1.0 and Serial Tower Juergen Stuber
|
| | | | Hi CSSoh, (...) yes, I cut out the wrong lines, I meant the one with AC adapter. (...) Maybe it is also too easy to fry the RCX that way, e.g. by using a transformer with a wrong voltage, and the customer service costs got out of hand. Cheers (...) (19 years ago, 16-Oct-05, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: $60 for RCX 1.0 and Serial Tower Chio Siong Soh
|
| | | | (...) But it's ok in the hands of AFOLs :-) C S Soh (19 years ago, 17-Oct-05, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |