To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.roboticsOpen lugnet.robotics in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Robotics / 23676
23675  |  23677
Subject: 
Re: FLL not allowing NQC
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.robotics
Date: 
Sat, 12 Mar 2005 23:19:04 GMT
Viewed: 
1111 times
  
In lugnet.robotics, Dick Swan wrote:
Having followed this very active thread with interest, there's several
important points that seem to have been very lightly glossed over.

The content of Robolab is changing and the FLL organizers will almost
certainly have to deal with this issue.

Robolab, in fact, currently delivers a different version of the standard LEGO
firmware than what is otherwise publicly available.  How, pray tell, is that
fair to FLL users who don't use Robolab?  Talk about an unfair advantage.

Ultimate Robolab (UR) creates a standalone firmware file from a program
that is then downloaded to the RCX.

I can't imagine FLL ever allowing Ultimate Robolab in their competitions.

Mindstorms for the AFOL and consumer market appears
totally stagnant.

I agree.  It is quite discouraging.

I haven't seen much comment on John Hansen's recent add to NQC to create
a text file containing LASM commands. It would seem that developing and
testing a program using NQC and then, just before competition, compiling
the LASM text with Mindscript will be "legal". If so, why not simply
allow NQC? [As an aside, Robolab also has an graphical "icon" where a
block of LASM commands can simply be pasted.]

Sounds legal to me. :-)

How
do you tell the unsophisticated FLL team and its coach that their entry
has been disqualified because they downloaded a patch from the official
Robolab site?

That's a good question.  If it becomes part of an official Robolab distribution
then it must be legal.

John Hansen



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: FLL not allowing NQC
 
Having followed this very active thread with interest, there's several important points that seem to have been very lightly glossed over. The content of Robolab is changing and the FLL organizers will almost certainly have to deal with this issue. (...) (20 years ago, 12-Mar-05, to lugnet.robotics)

5 Messages in This Thread:


Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR