 | | Re: Three cheers for Dave Baum !!! !!! !!!
|
|
Yes. Great stuff Dave and Mark ! We built a tracked robot and find the "remote control" utilizing the joystick (version 2.0 of RCXCC) to be just as cool as programming it to run autonomously. I am amazed at how well the IR tower communicates at all (...) (26 years ago, 4-Jan-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Three cheers for Dave Baum !!! !!! !!!
|
|
(...) I'm a little confused by the above statement. Does nqcc itself work using com3? If not, email me and perhaps we can debug it. Dave (26 years ago, 5-Jan-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Port problem with RCXCC (and not with nqcc)
|
|
Sorry if I was not clear. nqcc works PERFECTLY on COM3 (first channel of the Equinox board). The original Mindstormes software (and the RCXCC software) do NOT work on this port. I was hoping this would be some kind of big clue for Mark (what is (...) (26 years ago, 5-Jan-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Three cheers for Dave Baum !!! !!! !!!
|
|
In article <F525IC.As6@lugnet.com>, Jim Moran <lugnet.robotics@lugnet.com> writes (...) How long does a firmware download take with RCXCC and with Mindstorms software? Please could somebody time it, as I have just got my QBasic download program (...) (26 years ago, 5-Jan-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Three cheers for Dave Baum !!! !!! !!!
|
|
(...) Dave, I use COM4 every day :-) That's probably a driver incompatibility problem. Laurentino Martins *<||:-) [mailto:lau@mail.telepac.pt] [(URL) you check the web site first?: (URL) (26 years ago, 5-Jan-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Port problem with RCXCC (and not with nqcc)
|
|
(...) No handshaking is used with NQC. The packet protocol itself uses ACKs which in effect perform control flow (everything is done lock-step). Dave (26 years ago, 6-Jan-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
