To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.roboticsOpen lugnet.robotics in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Robotics / 22859
22858  |  22860
Subject: 
Re: Lego Compatible (was Re: JCX and Legos...)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.robotics
Date: 
Sat, 18 Sep 2004 00:44:21 GMT
Viewed: 
3341 times
  
In lugnet.robotics, Joe Strout wrote:
> In lugnet.robotics, Wayne Gramlich wrote:
> 
> > > More attractive would be a set of sensors and motors that work with a controller
> > > that I can also buy and just use.  In other words, make an alternative to the
> > > whole Mindstorms line, but fully compatible with LEGO bricks (including Technic
> > > parts etc.).  Make it cheaper to get started with than Mindstorms, and it would
> > > be very appealing to me.
> > 
> > Such a system already exists and it is called RoboBRiX.
> > The web site is <http://WWW.RoboBRiX.Com/>.
> 
> I can't just buy and use any of those, though -- soldering is required.  And
> though I've made a couple attempts to learn soldering in the past, it's almost
> always ended in frustration and fried components.
> 
> I'm not opposed to computing current draws or using a screwdriver, but as long
> as it requires a soldering iron, I'll probably just made do with RCX instead.

I hear you about soldering.  Getting assembled and tested boards into
people's hands is a very high priority (along with better documentation.)
We are exploring a number of options.

> But we've talked about this before, and I understand you're working on that, so
> I'll continue to watch.  (I don't expect to get serious into robotics for a few
> years yet anyway.)

Thanks for the patience; hopefully, getting assembled and tested boards
out there will not be a matter of years.

Later,

-Wayne



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Lego Compatible (was Re: JCX and Legos...)
 
(...) I can't just buy and use any of those, though -- soldering is required. And though I've made a couple attempts to learn soldering in the past, it's almost always ended in frustration and fried components. I'm not opposed to computing current (...) (22 years ago, 16-Sep-04, to lugnet.robotics)

7 Messages in This Thread:


Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR