Subject:
|
Re: legOS - Does it work for you?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Thu, 31 Dec 1998 16:30:40 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1314 times
|
| |
|
|
lego-robotics@crynwr.com (Ben Laurie) writes:
> Rick Kimball wrote:
> It might be worth picking up the standard malloc/free and seeing if they
> work any better.
Ben you were right! I replace the malloc/free routines with
a very simple array based allocation scheme and everything
works great. I guess the other malloc I grabbed off the net
wasn't any good either.
Thanks!
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: legOS - Does it work for you?
|
| (...) You may still have a stack overflow issue, since if your malloc replacement doesn't maintain pointer chains you may not notice if memory gets trashed. John A. Tamplin Traveller Information Services jat@Traveller.COM 2104 West Ferry Way (...) (26 years ago, 31-Dec-98, to lugnet.robotics)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: legOS - Does it work for you?
|
| (...) Hmmm ... not so sure if the task manager is responsible - I have a related (I think) problem if I use static variables - programs that work fine with global variables just lock solid when they are static. Since making them static merely moves (...) (26 years ago, 31-Dec-98, to lugnet.robotics)
|
12 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
