Subject:
|
Re: Working motorized focus for Vision Command
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Wed, 18 Dec 2002 13:12:09 GMT
|
Original-From:
|
Steve Baker <SJBAKER1@AIRMAILspamless.NET>
|
Viewed:
|
956 times
|
| |
|
|
Bluey wrote:
> I was thinking of the same procedure. But to help with the varried depth
> problem, a small part of the viewed area could be selected to be the
> focusing point.
Yes - that'll also make the algorithm run faster.
> So overall, it must be possible, right?
I'm sure it's possible. What I'm not sure about is whether the kind
of naive algorithm that I could come up with after just a few minutes
thought would be effective. It might take some rather serious image
processing algorithms to get a measure of how well focussed the image
is - and that might be a major learning experience!
Good Luck! Tell us what works.
---------------------------- Steve Baker -------------------------
HomeEmail: <sjbaker1@airmail.net> WorkEmail: <sjbaker@link.com>
HomePage : http://web2.airmail.net/sjbaker1
Projects : http://plib.sf.net http://tuxaqfh.sf.net
http://tuxkart.sf.net http://prettypoly.sf.net
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Working motorized focus for Vision Command
|
| Thanks for replying! I was thinking of the same procedure. But to help with the varried depth problem, a small part of the viewed area could be selected to be the focusing point. So overall, it must be possible, right? Timothy (...) (22 years ago, 18-Dec-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
15 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
