Subject:
|
Re: Line following algorithms
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Tue, 3 Dec 2002 03:57:20 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1491 times
|
| |
|
|
Jona wrote:
>
> In lugnet.robotics, Soh Chio Siong writes:
>
> > Thankfully, most competitions allow the use of two light sensors where
> > line following is involved. It goes to show that the organisers are real
> > people ;-)
>
> Well I suppose this statement applies to me since I have organized an event
> that limits the robots to a single light sensor. However, in my defense, I
> must say that the intent behind the rule was to make the game more fair for
> all competitors. Many of my group's members are new to robotics and have
> only the RIS. Some others are not new to it and have oodles of elements to
> build their creations with. In an attempt to make the challenge interesting
> to both types of competitors, I decided a single light sensor would be the
> only limitation. Obviously this makes some elements of the game more
> difficult then they would be with two or more light sensors. But I feel it
> does a lot to level the playing field.
>
> You can read the rules to our event here:
> http://www.24Tooth.com/LineFollowingRules.html
>
> So, do I qualify as a "real person"? :)
Of course.
But then, some are more "real" than others ;-)
--
C S Soh
CSSoh's Lego Pneumatics
http://www.ozbricks.net/cssoh1
... where air is power!
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Line following algorithms
|
| (...) Well I suppose this statement applies to me since I have organized an event that limits the robots to a single light sensor. However, in my defense, I must say that the intent behind the rule was to make the game more fair for all competitors. (...) (22 years ago, 2-Dec-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
14 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
Active threads in Robotics
|
|
|
|
|
|
