Subject:
|
Re: BASIC like programming alternatives?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Wed, 23 Dec 1998 00:25:55 GMT
|
Original-From:
|
Ian Hall-Beyer <MANUKA@NERDHERD.saynotospamNET>
|
Viewed:
|
1756 times
|
| |
|
|
On Tue, 22 Dec 1998, John Cutter wrote:
> want to write some reasonably sophisticated programs, but I'm afraid I don't
> know C...
Unfortunately, to write sophisticated programs, you need a sophisticated
language. which tosses anything even remotely BASIC-like (and most
interpreted languages) right out the window.
C is not that hard to learn if you've ever used any kind of structured
language before.
-Ian
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: BASIC like programming alternatives?
|
| (...) I'm not sure what this crack is about - the classical "interpreted" - ie hard to compile - languages (LISP, SETL, APL, SNOBOL, Icon, Smalltalk, Prolog, etc) have been anything but unsophisticated. In general, the more sophisticated the (...) (26 years ago, 24-Dec-98, to lugnet.robotics)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | BASIC like programming alternatives?
|
| I just discovered that my reliable VB 3.0 won't allow me to program the spirit.ocx. What other BASIC-like programming alternatives are out there? I want to write some reasonably sophisticated programs, but I'm afraid I don't know C... Thanks! -- (...) (26 years ago, 22-Dec-98, to lugnet.robotics)
|
12 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
