 | | Re: Curved Feet
|
|
Andy, I think the curved foot concept is the wrong direction for a two-legged mechanism. The few simple two-legged mechanisms I have seen rely on two feet, each with a VERY large footprint. Each footprint is large enough to support the weight of the (...) (24 years ago, 23-Mar-01, to lugnet.robotics)
|
|
 | | Re: Curved Feet
|
|
(...) What about using #32250 liftarms? They may not be large enough for your needs, but here's a pic: (URL) Regards Micah J. Mabelitini - LUGNET #918 The University of Kentucky SECC Middlesboro Academic Skills Resource Center accutron@kih.net - (...) (24 years ago, 23-Mar-01, to lugnet.robotics)
|
|
 | | Re: Robotics beginner question
|
|
(...) Well, if you want to keep the Lego 'firmware', you are pretty much stuck with 'NQC' (Not Quite C) which is a small C subset that generates the same kind of special bytecode as Lego's own graphical programming language. This is a relatively (...) (24 years ago, 23-Mar-01, to lugnet.robotics)
|
|
 | | Re: Curved Feet
|
|
(...) Andy: That's an interesting site. I can't think of a way to make curved feet, BUT there is the 1x6 sloped beam. as seen here: (URL) was thinking that if you used two of these with the "studs" pointing down, you might be able to replicate that (...) (24 years ago, 23-Mar-01, to lugnet.robotics)
|
|
 | | Re: Cheshire LEGOFest pictures
|
|
Perhaps you should let John Barnes answer for himself. Different people have different approaches here. Dave Baum, for example, has spent huge amounts of effort on NQC and has been quite happy for people to use his invention. (...) (24 years ago, 23-Mar-01, to lugnet.loc.uk, lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)
|
|
 | | Curved Feet
|
|
Hi, Skip to the bottom for the question :) I am getting back into building robots now, and decided I wanted to build a 2 legged walker. I looked at the various Lego solutions, and realized that none used pneumatics. That began my quest to build a (...) (24 years ago, 23-Mar-01, to lugnet.robotics)
|
|
 | | Re: Robotics beginner question
|
|
So you can choose what language you want to use? For example, could you use a C++ programing program like MS Visual C++, and transfer it to the RCX? Or is there specific software that comes with it? -Adam (...) (24 years ago, 23-Mar-01, to lugnet.robotics)
|
|
 | | Re: Cheshire LEGOFest pictures
|
|
Yes ? Steven Lane <Steveroblane@aol.com> schreef in berichtnieuws GAMGB6.Joo@lugnet.com... (...) (24 years ago, 23-Mar-01, to lugnet.loc.uk, lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)
|
|
 | | Re: Robotics beginner question
|
|
Any kind you want, there are a myriad of available languages to use with it, whether its the out of the box lego, paint by number language ;) , or the down and dirty full C/C++ legos language, and many others in between, forth, python, java, to name (...) (24 years ago, 23-Mar-01, to lugnet.robotics)
|
|
 | | Re: Robotics beginner question
|
|
What kind of programming do you do with the RCX? ~Adam (...) (24 years ago, 23-Mar-01, to lugnet.robotics)
|
|
 | | Re: Cheshire LEGOFest pictures
|
|
(...) You expect a genius to give away their secrets? Steve Lane P.S. not to mention all the hard work, development and, mental input? for free? (24 years ago, 22-Mar-01, to lugnet.loc.uk, lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)
|
|
 | | Re: Cheshire LEGOFest pictures
|
|
Are there electronic layouts available to make this masterpiece ? I'd love to get my hands on those :-) Koen (...) a (...) but (...) need (...) 9V (...) the (...) two (...) pressed (...) (24 years ago, 22-Mar-01, to lugnet.loc.uk, lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)
|
|
 | | Re: Robotics beginner question
|
|
(...) The expansion sets are meant to work with the Robotics Invention System (RIS), and to a (much) lesser extent the Robotics Discovery System (RDS). They don't integrate well with systems based on the micro-scout. The RCX is a big lego brick that (...) (24 years ago, 22-Mar-01, to lugnet.robotics)
|
|
 | | Robotics beginner question
|
|
Hi there, I recently picked up a 9748 DDK. I think it is a pretty fun set, for the limited amount of things that it does. I was wondering if someone who knows more about the Mindstorms stuff can answer a few questions for me. What are the expansion (...) (24 years ago, 22-Mar-01, to lugnet.robotics)
|
|
 | | Re: More juice out of the standard motors.
|
|
(...) Have you actually tried this? I've taken both my RCX's (1.0 & 2.0) apart, but, while there is a 5V regulator for the MCU, I couldn't see any regulator for the motor outputs. This doesn't mean it isn't there, just that I couldn't find it if it (...) (24 years ago, 22-Mar-01, to lugnet.robotics)
|
|
 | | Re: More juice out of the standard motors.
|
|
(...) The day I got my RCX2.0, I took it apart and confirmed my suspicion that the motor drivers used in the 1.0 are similar to a Melexis MLX10204. A similar chip is used in the 1.0, but the Melexis chip is used in the 2.0. I then fired off an (...) (24 years ago, 22-Mar-01, to lugnet.robotics)
|
|
 | | Re: More juice out of the standard motors.
|
|
(...) Have you tried building a transmission? Matthias Jetleb VA3-MWJ (24 years ago, 22-Mar-01, to lugnet.robotics)
|
|
 | | Re: Lego R/C etc
|
|
(...) Your experiments are similar to one I am attempting, albeit for a different purpose. Currently, I'm leaning toward local oscillator and I.F. stage with a double balanced mixer from Mini Circuits to place me in the 144Mhz region (although (...) (24 years ago, 22-Mar-01, to lugnet.robotics)
|
|
 | | New Site
|
|
I have created a new site as a reference for educators using RoboLab in the classroom. I would love to have some of you visit the site and provide feedback. At present we have only a few examples, but we are working on adding many more. The most (...) (24 years ago, 22-Mar-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.robolab, lugnet.robotics, lugnet.edu, lugnet.robotics.edu, lugnet.robotics.events.robot-arena, lugnet.robotics.rcx, lugnet.publish.html, lugnet.loc.us.in) !
|
|
 | | Re: Bug in RCX 2.0 beta (Was: RIS 2.0 software now in beta)
|
|
(...) Hi Sebastian I think you're right in your analysis and TLG may silently have fixed the problem, because if you look at the Vision Command installation, you'll find that some of the SDK DLLs are newer in that release. For fun, I copied the DLLs (...) (24 years ago, 21-Mar-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx, lugnet.robotics)
|