To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.roboticsOpen lugnet.robotics in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Robotics / 14049
14048  |  14050
Subject: 
Re: Ideal Tank Platform Was: adder-subtractor ????
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.robotics
Date: 
Tue, 23 Jan 2001 00:33:07 GMT
Original-From: 
Steve Baker <sjbaker1@airmail.netNOMORESPAM>
Reply-To: 
sjbaker1@airmail.net#avoidspam#
Viewed: 
426 times
  
Chris 'Xenon' Hanson wrote:

Anybody else have criteria they would like to add?

   Ideally:

   Both motors should be driven in 'forward' direction so if one
had a matched set of motors, you could perhaps achieve lateral
speed balance.

Well, if you read my *long* post from a week or so ago, you'll know
that motor mismatch makes up at least 11% of performance, motor
direction perhaps 1% or at most 2%, and HOW YOU BUILD YOUR MODEL
accounts for at least 7% ... even when you are being careful not
to trap axles.

Compared to those things, motor direction is almost irrelevent - and
certainly not worth much extra complexity.


--
Steve Baker   HomeEmail: <sjbaker1@airmail.net>
              WorkEmail: <sjbaker@link.com>
              HomePage : http://web2.airmail.net/sjbaker1
              Projects : http://plib.sourceforge.net
                         http://tuxaqfh.sourceforge.net
                         http://tuxkart.sourceforge.net
                         http://prettypoly.sourceforge.net
                         http://freeglut.sourceforge.net



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Ideal Tank Platform Was: adder-subtractor ????
 
(...) Yeah, I saw that. nice work, that. I figured I'd throw it in anyway on the principle that eliminating error of any source is always a noble cause. I like to use worm drives to 'turn the corner' anyway to get the extra torque so it's not a (...) (23 years ago, 23-Jan-01, to lugnet.robotics)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Ideal Tank Platform Was: adder-subtractor ????
 
(...) Ideally: Both motors should be driven in 'forward' direction so if one had a matched set of motors, you could perhaps achieve lateral speed balance. Forward end of tracks should be slightly elevated to grab and climb obstacles: <- Front * * * (...) (23 years ago, 22-Jan-01, to lugnet.robotics)

5 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR