 | | Re: LEGO Cam vs. X10's Xcam vs. other webcams
|
|
That was not a general statement. The X10's quality is poor for indoor lighting. There are several better wireless digital cameras out there that is far better than the X10, but it costs a lot more. Cant beat the $50 I paid for the X10 via ebay (...) (25 years ago, 22-Jan-01, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Interfacing Sharp's GP2D12 Distance Sensor to the RCX
|
|
Hi, Sorry about that I meant the GP2D12 not GP2D02. The subject line threw me off as the original post was about the D02 not D12... Ram (25 years ago, 22-Jan-01, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGO Cam vs. X10's Xcam vs. other webcams
|
|
(...) hmmm... I'm starting to think that the best (and expensive) way to have good quality wireless image is to mount the roverbot with a DV camcorder (those tiny new Digital Video expensive cams) together with a X10 wireless video-sender. :( oh (...) (25 years ago, 22-Jan-01, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | New guy on the blocks
|
|
Hi all, I just got a great deal on a RIS 1.5 but it came without the CD. Is there anything on it that I absolutely need to have in order to use the RIS? I can get the firmware from the mindstorm site right? Do I need any extra stuff in order to (...) (25 years ago, 22-Jan-01, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGO Cam vs. X10's Xcam vs. other webcams
|
|
The Lego Cam's quality is much better than the X10 as I have both. The X10 was designed for outdoor only and as such needs a lot of light otherwise the image is dark. The Lego Cam is the same as the quickcam. However, the wireless ability of the X10 (...) (25 years ago, 22-Jan-01, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | LEGO Cam vs. X10's Xcam vs. other webcams
|
|
Has anyone done (or know where to look for) a review on the image quality of the Lego Cam ? I'm interested to know where the Lego Cam stands when compared with other webcams including analog-video mini-cams like the Xcam ? At least, I would like to (...) (25 years ago, 22-Jan-01, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Interfacing Sharp's GP2D02 Distance Sensor to the RCX
|
|
(...) The GP2D02 is a very powerful sensor for a robot. Getting it to work will really be great. I think the best bet is to use a 9V battery box for this instead of using a precious output port... Ram (25 years ago, 22-Jan-01, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: Interfacing Sharp's GP2D02 Distance Sensor to the RCX
|
|
"Rainer BalzerowskI" <balze2@gmx.net> wrote in message news:G7K0HL.724@lugnet.com... (...) work out the power supply part. Probably taking all the power from the Motor Output or a 9V battery box so you wouldn't need D3 and D4. (25 years ago, 22-Jan-01, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: Interfacing Sharp's GP2D02 Distance Sensor to the RCX
|
|
(...) Another option would be a small battery box, if you have enough space in your model. Jürgen -- Jürgen Stuber <stuber@loria.fr> (URL) (25 years ago, 22-Jan-01, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: Cybermaster: Cannot receive though sending works (w/o sprit.ocx)
|
|
This page (URL) by Bert van Dam, has the (URL) link to the QBasic program I was talking about. mc. (...) (25 years ago, 22-Jan-01, to lugnet.robotics)
|
