To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.roboticsOpen lugnet.robotics in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Robotics / 13086
13085  |  13087
Subject: 
Re: Old idea or new idea?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.robotics
Date: 
Thu, 2 Nov 2000 21:12:10 GMT
Original-From: 
J Austin David <austin@havoc.gtf%nomorespam%.org>
Reply-To: 
austin@gtf.orgSPAMCAKE
Viewed: 
778 times
  
The method to this particular madness was that it could retain the
pre-existing Lego infrastructure of RCX's already equipped with the
IR links, battery boxes, for power distribution, because I don't fancy
having batteries in every sensor and motor brick, and standard
Lego wires.

Although there are a few of us ;) who might relish the thought of
happily scattering bits of our code throughout a small zoo of oddly
shaped semi-intelligent bricks, it can become quite the handful to
tame. And I'm not sure it's everybody's idea of fun.

By rather arbitrarily suggesting that all a remote sensor can do is
sense, or a remote motor can do is go forward, reverse or stop, the
opportunites to get thoroughly lost in a sea of autonomous processes
is greatly reduced.

3 things: sensors, actuators/motors, controllers.

Sensors: measure the environment
actuators/motors: chance the environment
controllers: input, output, software.

If you want your zoo of bricks, it's really a set of sensor/controllers
or motor/controllers.  You can do this today w/ scout+motor or RCX+sensor,
but the thing you want is prolly smaller than an RCX package.  So you also
want a tiny controller (1 in, 1 out, plus comm i/o) to go with a sensor;
else a tiny sensor+controller thingy, which would be a sensor with
embedded stripped-down controller.

Either way, it's all the same thing.  Getting them to behave, on the other
hand, it an altogether different issue (simulations with StarLogo?)
---
    J Austin David austindavid.com austin@gtf.org
      Life is hard.  It's harder if you use NT.



Message is in Reply To:
  RE: Old idea or new idea?
 
Ralph Hempel wrote: >Sounds like the MIT "Cricket" to me John.... >As an embedded guy yourself, you know this means distributing >power to each brick with its own battery, unless you want a wire >in which case you might as well use a standard serial (...) (24 years ago, 2-Nov-00, to lugnet.robotics)

6 Messages in This Thread:



Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR