 | | Re: CM: MotorCurrent —Laurentino Martins
|
| | | I only made one test with it, and by the looking at the results I couldn't tell if the motor running loaded, but I may be wrong! The result of the function seems to be: .If no motor is attached, the result is zero. .If a motor is attached and not (...) (26 years ago, 10-Dec-98, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: CM: MotorCurrent —Fredrik Glöckner
|
| | | | | (...) Yes, this sounds plausible. My comment on stall detections was probably wrong. Fredrik (26 years ago, 10-Dec-98, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: CM: MotorCurrent —Anders Isaksson
|
| | | | | (...) Laurentino Martins skrev i meddelandet <4.1.19981210111532....90.220>... (...) tell if the motor running loaded, but I may be wrong! (...) <snip> (...) make sure >children when playing their games with the computer, built their vehicles/robots (...) (26 years ago, 3-Jan-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: CM: MotorCurrent —Fredrik Glöckner
|
| | | | | | (...) And what would you say the current limit is? I believe Andy Bower used a limit of 95. Would that apply to your case as well? Fredrik (26 years ago, 3-Jan-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: CM: MotorCurrent —Joerg Volz
|
| | | | | | | Fredrik Glöckner schrieb in Nachricht ... (...) is (...) though. (...) I did this stall detection too, testing it first with the truck and the fork lifter with a loaded container. I had a current somewhere around 110mA when the truck starts to fall (...) (26 years ago, 3-Jan-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: CM: MotorCurrent —Anders Isaksson
|
| | | | | | Fredrik Glöckner skrev i meddelandet ... (...) is (...) though. (...) I didn't test with full power and stopped motor, so I don't really know. A value of 52 suited the Crusher arms, and that was enough for me. -- Anders Isaksson, Sweden BlockCAD: (2 (...) (26 years ago, 3-Jan-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: CM: MotorCurrent —Laurentino Martins
|
| | | | (...) Great! Another point in favor of CyberMaster! :-) In my test I saw that the value looked like random, and in fact it is very unstable, but I didn't went any further to see if it had a pattern. I'm glad it has. Laurentino Martins *<||:-) (...) (26 years ago, 3-Jan-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
